Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,704

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Model evaluations and sensitivity analyses

Open access
Guenther, Alex B., Zimmerman, Patrick R., Harley, Peter C., Monson, Russell K., Fall, Ray·1993·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The emission of isoprene and monoterpenes from plants is influenced by light and leaf temperature, which account for almost all short‐term variations (minutes to days) and a large part of spatial and long‐term variations. The temperature dependence of monoterpene emission varies among monoterpenes, plant species, and other factors, but a simple exponential relationship between emission rate (E) and leaf temperature (T), E = Es [exp (β(T − Ts))], provides a good approximation. A review of reported measurements suggests a best estimate of β = 0.09 K−1 for all plants and monoterpenes. Isoprene emissions increase with photosynthetically active radiation up to a saturation point at 700–900 μmol m−2 s−1. An exponential increase in isoprene emission is observed at leaf temperatures of less than 30°C. Emissions continue to increase with higher temperatures until a maximum emission rate is reached at about 40°C, after which emissions rapidly decline. This temperature dependence can be described by an enzyme activation equation that includes denaturation at high temperature. Algorithms developed to simulate these light and temperature responses perform well for a variety of plant species under laboratory and field conditions. Evaluations with field measurements indicate that these algorithms perform significantly better than earlier models which have previously been used to simulate isoprene emission rate variation. These algorithms account for about 90% of observed diurnal variability and can predict diurnal variations in hourly averaged isoprene emissions to within 35%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/93jd00527

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,704

Metadata

Authors
Guenther, A. B., Zimmerman, P. R., Harley, P. C., Monson, R. K., & Fall, R.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1993-07-20
Volume
98
Issue
D7
Pages
12609-12617
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117830870
Cited by
1,704
References
1
FWCI
11.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Model evaluations and sensitivity analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93jd00527
The paper
Guenther, A. B., Zimmerman, P. R., Harley, P. C., Monson, R. K., & Fall, R. (1993). Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Model evaluations and sensitivity analyses. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jd00527

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.