The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pinatubo and pre‐Pinatubo optical‐depth spectra: Mauna Loa measurements, comparisons, inferred particle size distributions, radiative effects, and relationship to lidar data
Abstract
The Ames airborne tracking sunphotometer was operated at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Mauna Loa Observatory (MLO) in 1991 and 1992 along with the NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory (CMDL) automated tracking sunphotometer and lidar. June 1991 measurements provided calibrations, optical‐depth spectra, and intercomparisons under relatively clean conditions; later measurements provided spectra and comparisons for the Pinatubo cloud plus calibration checks. June 1991 results are similar to previous MLO springtime measurements, with midvisible particle optical depth τ p(λ = 0.526μm) at the near‐background level of 0.012 ± 0.006 and no significant wavelength dependence in the measured range (λ = 0.38 to 1.06μm). The arrival of the Pinatubo cloud in July 1991 increased midvisible particle optical depth by more than an order of magnitude and changed the spectral shape of τ p(λ) to an approximate power law with an exponent of about −1.4. By early September 1991, the spectrum was broadly peaked near 0.5 μm, and by July 1992, it was peaked near 0.8 μm. Our optical‐depth spectra include corrections for diffuse light which increase postvolcanic midvisible τ p values by 1 to 3% (i.e., 0.0015 to 0.0023). NOAA‐ and Ames Research Center (ARC)‐measured spectra are in good agreement. Columnar size distributions inverted from the spectra show that the initial (July 1991) post‐Pinatubo cloud was relatively rich in small particles (r<0.25μm), which were progressively depleted in the August‐September 1991 and July 1992 periods. Conversely, both of the later periods had more of the optically efficient medium‐sized particles (0.25<r<1 μm) than did the fresh July 1991 cloud. These changes are consistent with particle growth by condensation and coagulation. The effective, or area‐weighted, radius increased from 0.22 ± 0.06μm in July 1991 to 0.56 ± 0.12 μm in August‐September 1991 and to 0.86 ± 0.29 μm in July 1992. Corresponding column mass values were 4.8 ± 0.7, 9.1 ± 2.7, and 5.5 ± 2.0 μg/cm 2, and corresponding column surface areas were 4.4 ± 0.5, 2.9 ± 0.2, and 1.1 ± 0.1 μm 2/cm 2. Photometer‐inferred column backscatter values agree with those measured by the CMDL lidar on nearby nights. Combining lidar‐measured backscatter profiles with photometer‐derived backscatter‐to‐area ratios gives peak particle areas that could cause rapid heterogeneous loss of ozone, given sufficiently low particle acidity and suitable solar zenith angles (achieved at mid‐ to high latitudes). Top‐of‐troposphere radiative forcings for the September 1991 and July 1992 optical depths and size distributions over MLO are about −5 and −3 W m−2, respectively (hence comparable in magnitude but opposite in sign to the radiative forcing caused by the increase in manmade greenhouse gases since the industrial revolution). Heating rates in the Pinatubo layer over MLO are 0.55 ± 0.13 and 0.41 ± 0.14 K d−1 for September 1991 and July 1992, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An emerging ground‐based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET
Holben, B. N., Tanré, D., Smirnov, A., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Abuhassan, N., Newcomb, W. W., Schafer, J. S., Chatenet, B., Lavenu, F., et al. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jd900014 · Cited by 2,104
Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R., et al. (2019) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-12-169-2019 · Cited by 1,396
Cloud-Screening and Quality Control Algorithms for the AERONET Database
Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Dubovik, O., & Slutsker, I. (2000) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00109-7 · Cited by 1,382
Impact winter and the Cretaceous/Tertiary extinctions: Results of a Chicxulub asteroid impact model
Pope, K. O., Baines, K. H., Ocampo, A. C., & Ivanov, B. A. (1994) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(94)90186-4 · Cited by 145
Stratospheric aerosol particles and solar-radiation management
Pope, F. D., Braesicke, P., Grainger, R. G., Kalberer, M., Watson, I. M., Davidson, P. J., & Cox, R. A. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1528 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, P. B., Livingston, J. M., Dutton, E. G., Pueschel, R. F., Reagan, J. A., DeFoor, T. E., Box, M. A., Allen, D., Pilewskie, P., Herman, B. M., Kinne, S. A., & Hofmann, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1993-12-20
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- D12
- Pages
- 22969-22985
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985998218
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pinatubo and pre‐Pinatubo optical‐depth spectra: Mauna Loa measurements, comparisons, inferred particle size distributions, radiative effects, and relationship to lidar data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93jd02308
- The paper
- Russell, P. B., Livingston, J. M., Dutton, E. G., Pueschel, R. F., Reagan, J. A., DeFoor, T. E., Box, M. A., Allen, D., Pilewskie, P., Herman, B. M., Kinne, S. A., & Hofmann, D. J. (1993). Pinatubo and pre‐Pinatubo optical‐depth spectra: Mauna Loa measurements, comparisons, inferred particle size distributions, radiative effects, and relationship to lidar data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jd02308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.