The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data
Abstract
Kumar and Monteith's (1981) model for the remote sensing of crop growth has been used to estimate continental net primary productivity (NPP) as well as its seasonal and spatial variations. The model assumes a decomposition of NPP into independent parameters such as incident solar radiation (S0), radiation absorption efficiency by canopies (ƒ), and conversion efficiency of absorbed radiation into organic dry matter (e). The precision on some of the input parameters has been improved, compared to previous uses of this model at a global scale: remote sensing data used to derive ƒ have been calibrated, corrected of some atmospheric effects, and filtered;e has been considered as biome‐dependent and derived from literature data. The resulting global NPP (approximatively 60 Gt C per year) is within the range of values given in the literature. However, mean NPP estimates per biome do not agree with the literature (in particular, the estimation for tropical rain forests NPP is much lower and for cultivations much higher than field estimates), which results in zonal and seasonal variations of continental NPP giving more weight to the temperate northern hemisphere than to the equatorial zone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Cited by
Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components
Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., & Falkowski, P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237 · Cited by 6,371
Global net primary production: Combining ecology and remote sensing
Field, C. B., Randerson, J. T., & Malmström, C. M. (1995) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)00066-v · Cited by 1,256
Yuan, W., Liu, S., Zhou, G., Zhou, G., Tieszen, L. L., Baldocchi, D., Bernhofer, C., Gholz, H., Goldstein, A. H., Goulden, M. L., et al. (2007) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.001 · Cited by 787
Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration: scaling from leaves to canopies
LEUNING, R., KELLIHER, F. M., DE PURY, D. G. G., & SCHULZE, E. ‐. (1995) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00628.x · Cited by 688
Global Terrestrial Gross and Net Primary Productivity from the Earth Observing System
Running, S. W., Thornton, P. E., Nemani, R., & Glassy, J. M. (2000) · Methods in Ecosystem Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1224-9_4 · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruimy, A., Saugier, B., & Dedieu, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-03-20
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- D3
- Pages
- 5263-5283
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001551649
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93jd03221
- The paper
- Ruimy, A., Saugier, B., & Dedieu, G. (1994). Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jd03221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.