The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2)
Abstract
The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) community climate model (CCM) has historically made use of a moist adiabatic adjustment procedure for parameterizing the effects of moist convection. The most recent version of the NCAR CCM, CCM2, has abandoned this approach in favor of a stability‐dependent mass‐flux representation of moist convective processes. This scheme physically constrains the process of moist convection with the use of a simple bulk cloud model, which provides a basis for estimating convective‐scale transports of heat, moisture, and other atmospheric constituents as well as the diabatic heating associated with condensation and the fallout of precipitation. This paper presents the formalism associated with this simple mass‐flux approach and contrasts its behavior with the moist adiabatic adjustment procedure used in earlier models. The inclusion of this scheme significantly moistens and warms the model troposphere at all latitudes but particularly in the tropics. Additionally, the simulated magnitude, structure, and location of the large‐scale mean circulations are generally improved. The sensitivity of the simulated climate to the formulation of the cloud model is also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model (BCC-CSM): the main progress from CMIP5 to CMIP6
Wu, T., Lu, Y., Fang, Y., Xin, X., Li, L., Li, W., Jie, W., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2019) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-12-1573-2019 · Cited by 1,069
The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 6 (WACCM6)
Gettelman, A., Mills, M. J., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., Smith, A. K., Marsh, D. R., Tilmes, S., Vitt, F., Bardeen, C. G., McInerny, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2019jd030943 · Cited by 786
Evaluation and model impacts of alternative boundary-layer height formulations
Vogelezang, D. H. P., & Holtslag, A. A. M. (1996) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1007/bf02430331 · Cited by 561
Southeast pacific stratocumulus in the community atmosphere model.
Medeiros, B., Williamson, D. L., Hannay, C., & Olson, J. G. (2012) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-11-00503.1 · Cited by 57
Variation of radiative forcings and global warming potentials from regional aviation NO x emissions
Skowron, A., Lee, D. S., & De León, R. R. (2015) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.043 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Hack, J. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-03-20
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- D3
- Pages
- 5551-5568
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022917081
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93jd03478
- The paper
- Hack, J. J. (1994). Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jd03478
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.