The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction of the interplanetary magnetic field strength
Abstract
A new model of the coronal and interplanetary magnetic field can predict both the interplanetary magnetic field strength and its polarity from measurements of the photospheric magnetic field. The model includes the effects of the large‐scale horizontal electric currents flowing in the inner corona, of the warped heliospheric current sheet in the upper corona, and of volume currents flowing in the region where the solar wind plasma totally controls the magnetic field. The model matches the MHD solution for a simple dipole test case better than earlier source surface and current sheet models. The strength and polarity of the radial interplanetary magnetic field component predicted for quiet time samples in each year from 1977 to 1986 agree with observations made near the Earth's orbit better than the hybrid MHD‐source surface model (Wang and Sheeley, 1988). The results raise the question of whether coronal holes are the only solar source of the interplanetary magnetic field in the solar wind. If some interplanetary flux originates outside coronal holes, the model can match the observed field using the accepted 1.8 saturation correction factor for λ5250 Å magnetograph observations. Requiring open flux to come exclusively from coronal holes requires an additional factor of two.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interaction of the solar wind with the local interstellar medium: a theoretical perspective
Zank, G. P. (1999) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1023/a:1005155601277 · Cited by 440
Stream structure and coronal sources of the solar wind during the May 12th, 1997 CME
Arge, C. N., Luhmann, J. G., Odstrcil, D., Schrijver, C. J., & Li, Y. (2004) · Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2004.03.018 · Cited by 340
Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of the solar corona during Whole Sun Month
(1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/1998ja900159 · Cited by 338
On space weather consequences and predictions
Feynman, J., & Gabriel, S. B. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/1999ja000141 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X., & Hoeksema, J. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- A1
- Pages
- 19-33
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001675793
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of the interplanetary magnetic field strength. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94ja02266
- The paper
- Zhao, X., & Hoeksema, J. T. (1995). Prediction of the interplanetary magnetic field strength. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja02266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.