Cited by 163High-pressure geophysics and materialsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisAstro and Planetary Science

Role of plates and temperature‐dependent viscosity in phase change dynamics

Open access
Zhong, Shijie, Gurnis, Michael·1994·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

The effects of plates and slabs on phase change dynamics have been investigated with convection models. Two complementary methods to simulate plates are used: material property and imposed surface velocity methods with temperature‐dependent viscosity. For a wide range of model parameters, plates and slabs exert a significant control on phase change dynamics. As plate length (and hence plate age and convection cell aspect ratio) increases, both the propensity for slab penetration and the mass flux across an endothermic phase change increase. When cold downwellings are stiffened with a temperature‐dependent rheology, slab penetration is enhanced, but total mass flux changes little. Plates organize large‐scale flow and thermal structure and thereby affect phase change dynamics. As plates become larger, the resulting largerscale structures are influenced less by endothermic phase changes, thus reducing the degree of layering. A model showing completely layered convection for a plate of unit length becomes unlayered when the plate is 3 or 5 times longer. For a given Clapeyron slope, the proportion of time for slab penetration increases from zero for cases with small plates to more than 0.5 for cases with large plates. The degree of layering, plate velocity, and mass flux are controlled by large‐scale structures, while slab penetration may be more related to small‐scale features. Therefore, whether or not subducted slabs penetrate the phase change may not necessarily indicate that convection is entirely layered or entirely unlayered. The episodicity of convection induced by an endothermic phase change strongly depends on plate length, rheology, and Clapeyron slope. A large plate and a stiff slab both weaken the episodicity of convection. Only for a certain range of Clapeyron slopes can the phase change induce a strong episodic thermal convection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/94jb00545

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerical studies with strong plates exhibit only a modest influence of the endothermic phase change on mantle dynamics.

    “Numerical studies with strong plates exhibit, however, only a modest influence of267 endothermic phase change on mantle dynamics”

    From Scaling of plate-tectonic convection with pseudoplastic rheology (2010) · cites this paper as Zhong and Gurnis, 1994

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that larger plates produce flow structures less influenced by endothermic phase changes, supporting a reduced influence in those models. But the finding is tied to plate length, not plate strength generally, and the Endothermic Phase Change Dynamics With a Plate section says the phase change still bends slabs and retards penetration even with large plates. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 163

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brooks, A. N., A Petrov-Galerkin finite element formulation for convection dominated flows, Ph.D. thesis, Calif. lust. of Techno!., Pasadena, 1981.
  2. Davies, G. F. and F., Pribac, Mesozoic seafloor subsidence and the Darwin Rise, past and present, in The Mesozoic Pacific: Geology, Tectonics, and Volcanism, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 77, edited by M. Pringle, W. Sager, W. Sliter and S. Stein, pp. 39-52, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1993.

Authors
Zhong, S., & Gurnis, M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1994-08-10
Volume
99
Issue
B8
Pages
15903-15917
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982461597
Cited by
163
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (8957164)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
temperature-dependent viscosity, plates, slabs, slab penetration, layered convection, plate length, Clapeyron slope, mass flux, thermal convection, large-scale flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review