The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution of the Santa Cruz Mountains, California, through tectonic growth and geomorphic decay
Abstract
I describe a strategy for modeling a specific large scale topographic feature that recognizes the discrepancy between tectonic and geomorphic scales and allows for important feedbacks between these processes. In the geomorphic model, the largest channel in each 4×4 km cell is explicitly treated, the channel incision being driven by a stream power rule. Hillslopes internal to each cell respond rapidly to incision of the local channel, prompting their treatment in the model as steady state forms. I present analytic expressions for the local relief, which is controlled by the local channel incision rate, and rate constants associated with the dominant hillslope process, either diffusive or landsliding. Initial conditions include any preexisting topography, and a lightly etched a channel network. The model is illustrated using the Santa Cruz Mountains, California. I show that an earlier hypothesis (that the Santa Cruz Mountains are due to advection of topography past an uplift source related to a restraining bend in the San Andreas Fault) remains viable when more specific geomorphic processes are considered. The local tectonics are represented by crustal thickening necessitated by conservation of mass in the bend, right‐lateral translation of crust with respect to the bend, and flexural response to the distributed load. The model produces reasonable geographic and statistical distributions of topography using rates of tectonic and geomorphic processes that are within the range of those measured locally. This argues that this restraining bend is a long‐lived feature of the San Andreas Fault. The slightly higher crest and shorter length of the southern Santa Cruz Mountains may potentially be explained by slightly faster slip of the crust west of the fault with respect to the bend than of that to the east. Deflection is minimal beneath these relatively small mountains, disallowing the interesting feedback of erosionally driven uplift. The predicted pattern of exhumation could be used to guide the search for fission track sites that could aid in the testing of the model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Orogeny and orography: The effects of erosion on the structure of mountain belts
Willett, S. D. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/1999jb900248 · Cited by 1,015
Snyder, N. P., Whipple, K. X., Tucker, G. E., & Merritts, D. J. (2000) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<1250:lrttfd>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 932
Syvitski, J. P. M., & Milliman, J. D. (2007) · The Journal of Geology · doi:10.1086/509246 · Cited by 928
A mechanistic model for river incision into bedrock by saltating bed load
Sklar, L. S., & Dietrich, W. E. (2004) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2003wr002496 · Cited by 759
Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., & Dietrich, W. E. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900090 · Cited by 705
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-10-10
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- B10
- Pages
- 20161-20179
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047338649
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of the Santa Cruz Mountains, California, through tectonic growth and geomorphic decay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94jb00713
- The paper
- Anderson, R. S. (1994). Evolution of the Santa Cruz Mountains, California, through tectonic growth and geomorphic decay. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb00713
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.