Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evolution of the Santa Cruz Mountains, California, through tectonic growth and geomorphic decay

Anderson, Robert S.·1994·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

I describe a strategy for modeling a specific large scale topographic feature that recognizes the discrepancy between tectonic and geomorphic scales and allows for important feedbacks between these processes. In the geomorphic model, the largest channel in each 4×4 km cell is explicitly treated, the channel incision being driven by a stream power rule. Hillslopes internal to each cell respond rapidly to incision of the local channel, prompting their treatment in the model as steady state forms. I present analytic expressions for the local relief, which is controlled by the local channel incision rate, and rate constants associated with the dominant hillslope process, either diffusive or landsliding. Initial conditions include any preexisting topography, and a lightly etched a channel network. The model is illustrated using the Santa Cruz Mountains, California. I show that an earlier hypothesis (that the Santa Cruz Mountains are due to advection of topography past an uplift source related to a restraining bend in the San Andreas Fault) remains viable when more specific geomorphic processes are considered. The local tectonics are represented by crustal thickening necessitated by conservation of mass in the bend, right‐lateral translation of crust with respect to the bend, and flexural response to the distributed load. The model produces reasonable geographic and statistical distributions of topography using rates of tectonic and geomorphic processes that are within the range of those measured locally. This argues that this restraining bend is a long‐lived feature of the San Andreas Fault. The slightly higher crest and shorter length of the southern Santa Cruz Mountains may potentially be explained by slightly faster slip of the crust west of the fault with respect to the bend than of that to the east. Deflection is minimal beneath these relatively small mountains, disallowing the interesting feedback of erosionally driven uplift. The predicted pattern of exhumation could be used to guide the search for fission track sites that could aid in the testing of the model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/94jb00713

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, R. S.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1994-10-10
Volume
99
Issue
B10
Pages
20161-20179
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047338649
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of the Santa Cruz Mountains, California, through tectonic growth and geomorphic decay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94jb00713
The paper
Anderson, R. S. (1994). Evolution of the Santa Cruz Mountains, California, through tectonic growth and geomorphic decay. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb00713

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.