Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 544

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bathymetric prediction from dense satellite altimetry and sparse shipboard bathymetry

Smith, Walter H. F., Sandwell, David T.·1994·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

The southern oceans (south of 30°S) are densely covered with satellite‐derived gravity data (track spacing 2–4 km) and sparsely covered with shipboard depth soundings (hundreds of kilometers between tracks in some areas). Flexural isostatic compensation theory suggests that bathymetry and downward continued gravity data may show linear correlation in a band of wave‐lengths 15–160 km, if sediment cover is thin and seafloor relief is moderate. At shorter wave‐lengths, the gravity field is insensitive to seafloor topography because of upward continuation from the seafloor to the sea surface; at longer wavelengths, isostatic compensation cancels out most of the gravity field due to the seafloor topography. We combine this theory with Wiener optimization theory and empirical evidence for gravity noise‐to‐signal ratios to design low‐pass and band‐pass filters to use in predicting bathymetry from gravity. The prediction combines long wavelengths (>160 km) from low‐pass‐filtered soundings with an intermediate‐wavelength solution obtained from multiplying downward continued, band‐pass‐filtered (15–160 km) gravity data by a scaling factor S. S is empirically determined from the correlation between gravity data and existing soundings in the 15–160 km band by robust regression and varies at long wave‐lengths. We find that areas with less than 200 m of sediment cover show correlation between gravity and bathymetry significant at the 99% level, and S may be related to the density of seafloor materials in these areas. The prediction has a horizontal resolution limit of 5–10 km in position and is within 100 m of actual soundings at 50% of grid points and within 240 m at 80% of these. In areas of very rugged topography the prediction underestimates the peak amplitudes of seafloor features. Images of the prediction reveal many tectonic features not seen on any existing bathymetrie charts. Because the prediction relies on the gravity field at wavelengths <160 km, it is insensitive to errors in the navigation of sounding lines but also cannot completely reproduce them. Therefore it may be used to locate tectonic features but should not be used to assess hazards to navigation. The prediction is available from the National Geophysical Data Center in both digital and printed form.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/94jb00988

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 544

Metadata

Authors
Smith, W. H. F., & Sandwell, D. T.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1994-11-10
Volume
99
Issue
B11
Pages
21803-21824
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980872241
Cited by
544
References
0
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bathymetric prediction from dense satellite altimetry and sparse shipboard bathymetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94jb00988
The paper
Smith, W. H. F., & Sandwell, D. T. (1994). Bathymetric prediction from dense satellite altimetry and sparse shipboard bathymetry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb00988

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.