The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An improved model for estimating emissions of volatile organic compounds from forests in the eastern United States
Open accessAbstract
Regional estimates of biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC) emissions are important inputs for models of atmospheric chemistry and carbon budgets. Since forests are the primary emitters of BVOCs, it is important to develop reliable estimates of their areal coverage and BVOC emission rate. A new system is developed to estimate these emissions for specific tree genera at hourly and county level resolution. The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis Eastwide Database is used to describe the areal extent, species composition, and tree diameter distributions of United States forests. Horizontal canopy occupancy by genera is then estimated as a function of diameter at breast height. Growing season peak foliar masses are derived from the empirical literature for canopies of deciduous and coniferous genera. A simple canopy model is used to adjust photosynthetically active solar radiation at five vertical levels in the canopy. Leaf temperature and photosynthetically active radiation derived from ambient conditions above the forest canopy are then used to drive empirical equations to estimate genus level emission rates of BVOCs vertically through forest canopies. These genera level estimates are then aggregated to regional levels for comparison with the regulatory model currently used and for input into air quality models. The proposed model yields isoprene emission rate estimates for specific countries that are 5 to 10 times higher (and total BVOC emission rates that are 3 to 5 times higher) than the Environmental Protection Agency BVOC emission rate model currently used. Emission estimates of isoprene and monoterpenes from the new system compare favorably with rates measured at various forested sites in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., & Geron, C. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006 · Cited by 4,603
Self-citationClassifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning
Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 · Cited by 1,871
Carboxylic acids in the troposphere, occurrence, sources, and sinks: A review
Chebbi, A., & Carlier, P. (1996) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/1352-2310(96)00102-1 · Cited by 727
Guenther, A. (2000) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00465-3 · Cited by 682
Self-citationA Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services
Nowak, D., Crane, D., Stevens, J., Hoehn, R., Walton, J., & Bond, J. (2008) · Arboriculture & Urban Forestry · doi:10.48044/jauf.2008.048 · Cited by 619
Metadata
- Authors
- Geron, C. D., Guenther, A. B., & Pierce, T. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-06-20
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- D6
- Pages
- 12773-12791
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135766384
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An improved model for estimating emissions of volatile organic compounds from forests in the eastern United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94jd00246
- The paper
- Geron, C. D., Guenther, A. B., & Pierce, T. E. (1994). An improved model for estimating emissions of volatile organic compounds from forests in the eastern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jd00246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.