The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marine boundary layer measurements of new particle formation and the effects nonprecipitating clouds have on aerosol size distribution
Abstract
Measurements of aerosol size distributions (0.005 < r < 20 μm), cloud droplet spectra, SO 2, O 3, CN, and other supporting quantities were made in the cloud‐topped and clear marine boundary layer (MBL) from an airship operating within about 50 km of the Oregon coast. Comparison of size distribution of interstitial aerosol within the cloud with the size distribution below the cloud clearly indicates that the processing of the aerosol through (nonprecipitating) stratus can lead to increased mass of the subset of particles which had served as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). This increase in mass in the CCN results in a distinct “cloud residue” mode in the size distribution measured below the cloud. In all cases the aerosol mass in the cloud residue mode greatly exceeded the mass in the interstitial mode, even though the number concentration of interstitial particles sometimes exceeded the CCN concentration. Evidence of new particle formation in clear air was also found on numerous occasions. Analyses of the data indicate that the growth of newly formed particles into the observed size range is consistent with gas phase oxidation of SO 2 to sulfate and subsequent condensation on the aerosol. However, the exact nucleation process, whether by homogeneous nucleation, ion‐assisted nucleation, or heterogeneous nucleation on precursor embryos, is still an open question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hoppel, W. A., Fitzgerald, J. W., Frick, G. M., Larson, R. E., & Mack, E. J. (1990) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd095id04p03659 · Cited by 427
Self-citationEffect of nonprecipitating clouds on the aerosol size distribution in the marine boundary layer
Hoppel, W. A., Frick, G. M., & Larson, R. E. (1986) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/gl013i002p00125 · Cited by 346
Self-citationNucleation and Atmospheric Aerosols
(2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6475-3 · Cited by 317
On the vapor pressure of sulfuric acid
Ayers, G. P., Gillett, R. W., & Gras, J. L. (1980) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/gl007i006p00433 · Cited by 258
New particle formation in the marine boundary layer
Covert, D. S., Kapustin, V. N., Quinn, P. K., & Bates, T. S. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/92jd02074 · Cited by 234
Particle production associated with marine clouds
Hegg, D. A., Radke, L. F., & Hobbs, P. V. (1990) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd095id09p13917 · Cited by 178
On the kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of aquated sulfur dioxide by ozone
Hoffmann, M. R. (1986) · Atmospheric Environment (1967) · doi:10.1016/0004-6981(86)90147-2 · Cited by 168
Heterogeneous Atmospheric Chemistry
Schryer, D. R. (1982) · Geophysical monograph · doi:10.1029/gm026 · Cited by 109
Dingenen, R. V., & elisabeth, R. F. P. (1991) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786829108959516 · Cited by 76
Frick, G. M., & Hoppel, W. A. (1993) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Cited by
The case against climate regulation via oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions
Quinn, P. K., & Bates, T. S. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10580 · Cited by 704
Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles
Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., et al. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.091 · Cited by 678
MEASURED ATMOSPHERIC NEW PARTICLE FORMATION RATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEATION MECHANISMS
WEBER, R. J., MARTI, J. J., McMURRY, P. H., EISELE, F. L., TANNER, D. J., & JEFFERSON, A. (1996) · Chemical Engineering Communications · doi:10.1080/00986449608936541 · Cited by 396
Lance, S. (2012) · Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · doi:10.1175/jtech-d-11-00208.1 · Cited by 140
Boyer, M., Aliaga, D., Pernov, J. B., Angot, H., Quéléver, L. L. J., Dada, L., Heutte, B., Dall'Osto, M., Beddows, D. C. S., Brasseur, Z., et al. (2023) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-23-389-2023 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoppel, W. A., Frick, G. M., Fitzgerald, J. W., & Larson, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-07-20
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- D7
- Pages
- 14443-14459
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134267629
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 19.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marine boundary layer measurements of new particle formation and the effects nonprecipitating clouds have on aerosol size distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94jd00797
- The paper
- Hoppel, W. A., Frick, G. M., Fitzgerald, J. W., & Larson, R. E. (1994). Marine boundary layer measurements of new particle formation and the effects nonprecipitating clouds have on aerosol size distribution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jd00797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
