The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entrainment of free tropospheric aerosols as a regulating mechanism for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote marine boundary layer
Abstract
A box model has been developed to study the formation of cloud condensation nuclei from DMS, in the unpolluted marine boundary layer (MBL). Chemical and microphysical processes include gas phase chemistry of DMS and SO 2, formation and growth of H 2 SO 4‐H 2 O aerosols, in‐cloud SO 2 oxidation, and scavenging of SO 2 and H 2 SO 4 molecules by sea salt, cloud drops, and precipitation. Meteorological processes include exchange between the MBL and the overlying free troposphere (FT) and horizontal mixing after particle removal by precipitation. The description of the FT aerosol is based on the notion of new particle production in the upper troposphere (for which there is experimental evidence) and the notion that these particles evolve into a self‐preserving aerosol (for which there is no clear experimental evidence yet). We argue that FT aerosols are expected to be self‐preserving in areas of large‐scale subsidence such as the subtropics. The model results are in reasonable agreement with summer observations of DMS, SO 2, non‐sea‐salt (nss) SO 4, CN, and CCN at Cape Grim. They show that entrainment of FT aerosols in the MBL quenches new particle formation within the MBL. A sensitivity/uncertainty analysis shows that most of the variation in the number concentration of MBL aerosols is due to the variation in parameters linked to the FT aerosol, whereas most of the variations in the MBL nss‐sulphate mass is due to variations in the DMS flux. We conclude that FT‐MBL exchange is likely to be an important mechanism that can explain both the observed levels of CN and CCN (active in stratiform clouds) in the MBL and their lack of short‐term variability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., & Warren, S. G. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326655a0 · Cited by 4,305
Cited by
Atmospheric Aerosols: Biogeochemical Sources and Role in Atmospheric Chemistry
Andreae, M. O., & Crutzen, P. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5315.1052 · Cited by 1,644
The case against climate regulation via oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions
Quinn, P. K., & Bates, T. S. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10580 · Cited by 704
MEASURED ATMOSPHERIC NEW PARTICLE FORMATION RATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEATION MECHANISMS
WEBER, R. J., MARTI, J. J., McMURRY, P. H., EISELE, F. L., TANNER, D. J., & JEFFERSON, A. (1996) · Chemical Engineering Communications · doi:10.1080/00986449608936541 · Cited by 396
Chemistry of HOx radicals in the upper troposphere
Jaeglé, L. (2001) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00376-9 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Raes, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-02-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- D2
- Pages
- 2893-2903
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157315585
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entrainment of free tropospheric aerosols as a regulating mechanism for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote marine boundary layer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94jd02832
- The paper
- Raes, F. (1995). Entrainment of free tropospheric aerosols as a regulating mechanism for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote marine boundary layer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jd02832
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.