Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 674

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sortable silt and fine sediment size/composition slicing: Parameters for palaeocurrent speed and palaeoceanography

McCave, I. N., Manighetti, B., Robinson, S. G.·1995·Paleoceanography

Abstract

Fine sediment size (<63 µm) is best measured by a sedimentation technique which records the whole size distribution. Repeated size measurement with intermediate steps of removal of components by dissolution, allows inference of the size distribution of the removed component as well as the residue. In this way, the size of the biogenic and lithogenic (noncarbonate) fractions can be determined. Observations of many size distributions suggest a minimum in grain size frequency curves at 8 to 10 µm. The dynamics of sediment erosion, deposition, and aggregate breakup suggest that fine sediment behavior is dominantly cohesive below 10‐µm grain size, and noncohesive above that size. Thus silt coarser than 10 µm displays size sorting in response to hydrodynamic processes and its properties may be used to infer current speed. Silt that is finer than 10 µm behaves in the same way as clay (<2 µm). Useful parameters of the distribution are the 10–63 µm mean size and the percentage 10–63 µm in the fine fraction. We cannot use size distributions to distinguish the nature of the currents. Therefore, to infer water mass advection speeds (i.e., the mean kinetic energy of the flow, K M), regions of high eddy kinetic energy (K E) must be avoided. At the present, such abyssal regions lie under the high surface K E of major current systems: Gulf Stream, Kuroshio, Agulhas, Antarctic Circumpolar Current, and Brazil/Falkland currents in the Argentine Basin. This is probably a satisfactory guide for the Pleistocene. With regard to the carbonate subfraction of the size spectrum, size modes due to both coccoliths and foraminiferal fragments can be recognized and analyzed, with the boundary between them again at about 10 µm. The flux of less than 10 µm carbonate, at pelagic sites above the lysocline, is another candidate for a productivity indicator.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/94pa03039

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 674

Metadata

Authors
McCave, I. N., Manighetti, B., & Robinson, S. G.
Venue
Paleoceanography
Published
1995-06
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
593-610
ISSN
  • 0883-8305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9186
OpenAlex
W1995471679
Cited by
674
References
0
FWCI
16.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sortable silt and fine sediment size/composition slicing: Parameters for palaeocurrent speed and palaeoceanography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94pa03039
The paper
McCave, I. N., Manighetti, B., & Robinson, S. G. (1995). Sortable silt and fine sediment size/composition slicing: Parameters for palaeocurrent speed and palaeoceanography. Paleoceanography. https://doi.org/10.1029/94pa03039

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.