The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Formaldehyde, glyoxal, and methylglyoxal in air and cloudwater at a rural mountain site in central Virginia
Open accessAbstract
As part of the Shenandoah Cloud and Photochemistry Experiment (SCAPE), we measured formaldehyde (HCHO), glyoxal (CHOCHO), and methylglyoxal (CH 3 C(O)CHO) concentrations in air and cloudwater at Pinnacles (elevation 1037 m) in Shenandoah National Park during September 1990. Mean gas‐phase concentrations of HCHO and CHOCHO were 980 and 44 pptv, respectively. The concentration of CH 3 C(O)CHO rarely exceeded the detection limit of 50 pptv. Mean cloudwater concentrations of HCHO and CHOCHO were 9 and 2 μ M, respectively; the mean CH 3 C(O)CHO concentration was below its detection limit of 0.3 μ M. The maximum carbonyl concentrations were observed during stagnation events with high O 3, peroxides, and CO. Outside of these events the carbonyls did not correlate significantly with O 3, CO, or NO y. Carbonyl concentrations and concentration ratios were consistent with a major source for the carbonyls from isoprene oxidation. Oxidation of CH 4 supplies a significant background of HCHO. The carbonyl concentrations were indistinguishable in two size fractions of cloudwater having a cut at d=18 μm. Gas‐ and aqueous‐phase concentrations of HCHO from samples collected during a nighttime cloud event agree with thermodynamic equilibria within a factor of 2. Samples collected during a daytime cloud event show HCHO supersaturation by up to a factor of 4. Positive artifacts in the cloudwater samples due to hydrolysis of hydroxymethylhydroperoxide (HOCH 2 OOH) could perhaps account for this discrepancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Formation of Urban Fine Particulate Matter
Zhang, R., Wang, G., Guo, S., Zamora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Hu, M., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067 · Cited by 1,426
Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone
Jacob, D. (2000) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00462-8 · Cited by 1,289
Self-citationFu, T., Jacob, D. J., Wittrock, F., Burrows, J. P., Vrekoussis, M., & Henze, D. K. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2007jd009505 · Cited by 746
Self-citationBrown Carbon Formation by Aqueous-Phase Carbonyl Compound Reactions with Amines and Ammonium Sulfate
Powelson, M. H., Espelien, B. M., Hawkins, L. N., Galloway, M. M., & De Haan, D. O. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4038325 · Cited by 332
De Haan, D. O., Hawkins, L. N., Kononenko, J. A., Turley, J. J., Corrigan, A. L., Tolbert, M. A., & Jimenez, J. L. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es102933x · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Munger, J. W., Jacob, D. J., Daube, B. C., Horowitz, L. W., Keene, W. C., & Heikes, B. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-05-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- D5
- Pages
- 9325-9333
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160450643
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formaldehyde, glyoxal, and methylglyoxal in air and cloudwater at a rural mountain site in central Virginia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95jd00508
- The paper
- Munger, J. W., Jacob, D. J., Daube, B. C., Horowitz, L. W., Keene, W. C., & Heikes, B. G. (1995). Formaldehyde, glyoxal, and methylglyoxal in air and cloudwater at a rural mountain site in central Virginia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd00508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.