Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structural expressions and tectonic implications of general noncoaxial flow in the midcrust of a collisional orogen: The northern Scandinavian Caledonides

Northrup, C. J.·1996·Tectonics

Abstract

Mapping and strain analysis in the northern Scandinavian Caledonides indicate that one way in which contemporaneous upper crustal extension and deeper thrusting within collisional orogens may be linked in a kinematically compatible manner is through the ductile flow of rocks in the midcrust of these mountain belts. In the Ofoten‐Efjorden region of north Norway, amphibolite facies metamorphism and strong penetrative strain occurred at deep levels of the Caledonian nappe stack as it was thrust eastward onto the western margin of Baltica. Kinematic analysis of deformation in the lower portion of the Caledonian nappe stack indicates that the rock mass underwent heterogeneous noncoaxial flow, with components of foreland directed simple shear and subvertically shortened pure shear. General noncoaxial flow (simultaneous simple shear + pure shear) can accomplish foreland‐directed tectonic transport, subvertical thinning, and transport‐parallel elongation at deep levels of a nappe stack. This pattern of flow is significant technically for two reasons: first, it suggests spreading of the Caledonian allochthon during thrust emplacement, and second, it can form a kinematic link between normal faulting at shallower structural levels and thrusting at the base of the nappes. By analogy with the Caledonides, general noncoaxial flow of midcrustal rocks may represent an important process in other collisional and contractional orogens, particularly in those that have undergone upper crustal extension while thrusting continued in the foreland.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/95tc02951

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1111/j.1365-3121.1991.tb00148.x · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0191-8141(94)90063-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90121-X · DOI
  4. Bartley J. M. Structural geology metamorphism and Rb/Sr geochronology of east Hinnøy north Norway Ph.D. thesis Mass. Inst. of Technol. Cambridge 1980.
  5. 10.1016/0040-1951(82)90018-X · DOI
  6. Bartley J. M., 1984, Caledonian structural geology and tectonics of east Hinnøy, north Norway, Bull. Nor. Geol. Unders., 396, 1
  7. 10.1016/0040-1951(75)90021-9 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0040-1951(86)90157-5 · DOI
  9. 10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<1043:DBAEOA>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  10. 10.1130/0091-7613(1985)13<679:NEWTCH>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  11. 10.1130/SPE269-p1 · DOI
  12. 10.1029/TC009i006p01275 · DOI
  13. 10.1130/0016-7606(1978)89<1189:MOTFB>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  14. 10.1029/94TC03091 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0191-8141(83)90015-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0737:PEOTCO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  17. Gee D. G., 1975, A tectonic model for the central part of the Scandinavian Caledonides, Am. J. Sci., 275, 468
  18. 10.1016/0040-1951(78)90040-9 · DOI
  19. 10.2475/ajs.274.1.1 · DOI
  20. Gee D. G., 1985, The Caledonian Orogen ‐ Scandinavia and Related Areas
  21. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90126-0 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/285319a0 · DOI
  23. 10.1017/S0016756800037717 · DOI
  24. Hodges K. V. Tectonic evolution of the Aefjord‐Sitas area Norway‐Sweden Ph.D. thesis Mass. Inst. of Technol. Cambridge 1982.
  25. Hodges K. V., 1985, Tectonic stratigraphy and structural evolution of the Efjord‐Sitasjaure area, Northern Scandinavian Caledonides, Bull. Nor. Geol. Unders., 399, 41
  26. 10.1029/JB089iB08p07077 · DOI
  27. 10.1130/0016-7606(1992)104<0560:EITCSO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  28. 10.1029/TC001i005p00441 · DOI
  29. 10.1098/rsta.1988.0087 · DOI
  30. 10.1130/0016-7606(1959)70[115:ROFPIM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0040-1951(83)90083-5 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0191-8141(80)90024-3 · DOI
  33. 10.1130/0016-7606(1986)97<1037:DOOWAT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0191-8141(80)90002-4 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1989.tb00573.x · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0040-1951(75)90058-X · DOI
  37. 10.1080/11035897709455004 · DOI
  38. 10.1144/GSL.SP.1981.009.01.11 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Roberts D., 1985, The Caledonian Orogen ‐ Scandinavia and Related Areas, 55
  40. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90127-9 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0040-1951(82)90237-2 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0191-8141(93)90075-L · DOI
  43. Steltenpohl M. G. The structure and stratigraphy of the Ofoten synform North Norway M.S. thesis Univ. of Alabama University 1983.
  44. Steltenpohl M. G. The structural and metamorphic history of Skanland north Norway and its significance for tectonics in Scandinavia Ph.D. thesis Univ. of North Carolina Chapel Hill 1985.
  45. 10.1007/BF00375530 · DOI
  46. 10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<0140:CFABFI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  47. 10.1130/SPE230-p17 · DOI
  48. Tull J. F. The geochronology and structure of Vestvagoy in Lofoten North Norway Ph.D. thesis 149 pp. Rice Univ. Houston Tex. 1972.
  49. 10.1029/95TC00086 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/978-94-011-3066-0_2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Northrup, C. J.
Venue
Tectonics
Published
1996-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
490-505
ISSN
  • 0278-7407
  • 1944-9194
Cited by
48
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review