The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments
Open accessAbstract
We consider catchment hydrologic response as if determined from the two independent processes of hillslope and channel network transport, operating across all the hillslopes and stream channels forming a catchment. This raises a number of interesting questions. Which process response characterizes a catchment's response? What governs the importance of one process over another? Is catchment response linear and time invariant, despite inherent nonlinearity in the runoff transport processes? Such questions, fundamental to an understanding of the nature of catchment response, are examined in this paper. We use a theoretical framework provided by geomorphology‐based models of runoff routing to examine the hydrologic response over a range of catchment sizes. We demonstrate the effects of catchment size upon the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments. Motivated by the concept of geomorphological dispersion, we parameterize these processes in terms of catchment wave celerity and a catchment dispersion coefficient. We show that these catchment parameters vary with catchment size and provide insights into the nonlinearity of catchment response and the relative roles of the constituent processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems
GOMI, T., SIDLE, R. C., & RICHARDSON, J. S. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0905:upadlo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 841
Current research issues related to post-wildfire runoff and erosion processes
Moody, J. A., Shakesby, R. A., Robichaud, P. R., Cannon, S. H., & Martin, D. A. (2013) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.03.004 · Cited by 693
Sawicz, K., Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., & Carrillo, G. (2011) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011 · Cited by 549
Self-citationTransit times—the link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale
Hrachowitz, M., Benettin, P., van Breukelen, B. M., Fovet, O., Howden, N. J. K., Ruiz, L., van der Velde, Y., & Wade, A. J. (2016) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1155 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, J. S., Sivapalan, M., & Snell, J. D.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3089-3101
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1983528093
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95wr01948
- The paper
- Robinson, J. S., Sivapalan, M., & Snell, J. D. (1995). On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/95wr01948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.