The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Model estimates of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural lands in the United States
Abstract
The Denitrification‐Decomposition (DNDC) model was used to elucidate the role of climate, soil properties, and farming practices in determining spatial and temporal variations in the production and emission of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) from agriculture in the United States. Sensitivity studies documented possible causes of annual variability in N 2 O flux for a simulated Iowa corn‐growing soil. The 37 scenarios tested indicated that soil tillage and nitrate pollution in rainfall may be especially significant anthropogenic factors which have increased N 2 O emissions from soils in the United States. Feedbacks to climate change and biogeochemical manipulation of agricultural soil reflect complex interactions between the nitrogen and carbon cycles. A 20% increase in annual average temperature in °C produced a 33% increase in N 2 O emissions. Manure applications to Iowa corn crops enhanced carbon storage in soils, but also increased N 2 O emissions. A DNDC simulation of annual N 2 O emissions from all crop and pasture lands in the United States indicated that the value lies in the range 0.9–1.2 TgN. Soil tillage and fertilizer use were the most important farming practices contributing to enhanced N 2 O emissions at the national scale. Soil organic matter and climate variables were the primary determinants of spatial variability in N 2 O emissions. Our results suggest that the United States Government, and possibly the Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC), have underestimated the importance of agriculture as a national and global source of atmospheric N 2 O. The coupled nature of the nitrogen and carbon cycles in soils results in complex feedbacks which complicate the formulation of strategies to reduce the global warming potential of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nitrogen in crop production: An account of global flows
Smil, V. (1999) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb900015 · Cited by 986
DNDC: A process-based model of greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural soils
Giltrap, D. L., Li, C., & Saggar, S. (2010) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.06.014 · Cited by 431
Self-citationModeling Trace Gas Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems
Li, C. S. (2000) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1023/a:1009859006242 · Cited by 409
Self-citationNazaries, L., Murrell, J. C., Millard, P., Baggs, L., & Singh, B. K. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12149 · Cited by 368
Li, C., Frolking, S., & Butterbach-Bahl, K. (2005) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-005-6791-5 · Cited by 351
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Narayanan, V., & Harriss, R. C.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 297-306
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1978042669
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model estimates of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural lands in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96gb00470
- The paper
- Li, C., Narayanan, V., & Harriss, R. C. (1996). Model estimates of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural lands in the United States. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/96gb00470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.