The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalized model for N2 and N2O production from nitrification and denitrification
Abstract
We describe a model of N 2 and N 2 O gas fluxes from nitrification and denitrification. The model was developed using laboratory denitrification gas flux data and field‐observed N 2 O gas fluxes from different sites. Controls over nitrification N 2 O gas fluxes are soil texture, soil NH 4, soil water‐filled pore space, soil N turnover rate, soil p H, and soil temperature. Observed data suggest that nitrification N 2 O gas fluxes are proportional to soil N turnover and that soil NH 4 levels only impact N 2 O gas fluxes with high levels of soil NH 4 (>3 μg N g−1). Total denitrification (N 2 plus N 2 O) gas fluxes are a function of soil heterotrophic respiration rates, soil NO 3, soil water content, and soil texture. N 2:N 2 O ratio is a function of soil water content, soil NO 3, and soil heterotrophic respiration rates. The denitrification model was developed using laboratory data [Weier et al, 1993] where soil water content, soil NO 3, and soil C availability were varied using a full factorial design. The Weier's model simulated observed N 2 and N 2 O gas fluxes for different soils quite well with r2 equal to 0.62 and 0.75, respectively. Comparison of simulated model results with field N 2 O data for several validation sites shows that the model results compare well with the observed data (r2 = 0.62). Winter denitrification events were poorly simulated by the model. This problem could have been caused by spatial and temporal variations in the observed soil water data and N 2 O fluxes. The model results and observed data suggest that approximately 14% of the N 2 O fluxes for a shortgrass steppe are a result of denitrification and that this percentage ranged from 0% to 59% for different sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burford, J. R., & Bremner, J. M. (1975) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(75)90055-3 · Cited by 742
Cited by
Closing the global N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle
Mosier, A., Kroeze, C., Nevison, C., Oenema, O., Seitzinger, S., & van Cleemput, O. (1998) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1023/a:1009740530221 · Cited by 1,198
Self-citationStehfest, E., & Bouwman, L. (2006) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7 · Cited by 991
DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing
Parton, W. J., Hartman, M., Ojima, D., & Schimel, D. (1998) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/s0921-8181(98)00040-x · Cited by 865
Self-citationGijsman, A. J., Hoogenboom, G., Parton, W. J., & Kerridge, P. C. (2002) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2002.4620 · Cited by 307
Self-citationManagement Strategies to Mitigate N2O Emissions in Agriculture
Hassan, M. U., Aamer, M., Mahmood, A., Awan, M. I., Barbanti, L., Seleiman, M. F., Bakhsh, G., Alkharabsheh, H. M., Babur, E., Shao, J., et al. (2022) · Life · doi:10.3390/life12030439 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Parton, W. J., Mosier, A. R., Ojima, D. S., Valentine, D. W., Schimel, D. S., Weier, K., & Kulmala, A. E.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 401-412
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2162027241
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized model for N2 and N2O production from nitrification and denitrification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96gb01455
- The paper
- Parton, W. J., Mosier, A. R., Ojima, D. S., Valentine, D. W., Schimel, D. S., Weier, K., & Kulmala, A. E. (1996). Generalized model for N2 and N2O production from nitrification and denitrification. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/96gb01455
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.