The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nondilatant brittle deformation of serpentinites: Implications for Mohr‐Coulomb theory and the strength of faults
Open accessAbstract
We conducted deformation experiments to investigate the strength, deformation processes, and nature of the brittle‐ductile transition of lizardite and antigorite serpentinites. A transition from localized to distributed deformation occurs as confining pressure increases from ∼200 to ∼400 MPa at room temperature. Deformation in both brittle (localized) and ductile (distributed) regimes is accommodated by shear microcracks, which form preferentially parallel to the (001) cleavage. Axial microcracks (mode I) are infrequently observed. Volumetric strain measurements demonstrate that brittle deformation is mostly nondilatant, consistent with the shear‐dominated microcracking. Three observations indicate that deformation in the ductile regime is accommodated by cataclastic flow: (1) a lack of evidence for crystal plastic deformation, (2) a positive pressure dependence of the maximum differential stress, and (3) abundant evidence for brittle microcracking. The weakness of serpentinites relative to other brittle rocks is explained by a low fracture strength along the (001) cleavage, combined with the low pressure dependence of strength. The transition from brittle to ductile deformation occurs at the crossover between the strength of intact serpentinite and the friction law unique to each type of serpentinite, rather than the more general Byerlee's law. If brittle deformation regimes are defined based on the mode of microcracking and on the occurrence of crystal plasticity, serpentinites define an end‐member style of nondilatant brittle deformation. This deformation style may result in extremely weak faults in nature, and it may also strongly influence the tectonic evolution of the oceanic lithosphere where serpentinite is present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments
Kohlstedt, D. L., Evans, B., & Mackwell, S. J. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/95jb01460 · Cited by 1,603
Self-citation
Cited by
The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting
Scholz, C. H. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316681473 · Cited by 910
Exhumation of high‐pressure metamorphic rocks in a subduction channel: A numerical simulation
Gerya, T. V., Stöckhert, B., & Perchuk, A. L. (2002) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/2002tc001406 · Cited by 843
Tucholke, B. E., Lin, J., & Kleinrock, M. C. (1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/98jb00167 · Cited by 572
High-Pressure Creep of Serpentine, Interseismic Deformation, and Initiation of Subduction
Hilairet, N., Reynard, B., Wang, Y., Daniel, I., Merkel, S., Nishiyama, N., & Petitgirard, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1148494 · Cited by 443
Catastrophic initiation of subduction following forced convergence across fracture zones
Hall, C. E., Gurnis, M., Sdrolias, M., Lavier, L. L., & Müller, R. D. (2003) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00242-5 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Escartín, J., Hirth, G., & Evans, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-02-10
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- B2
- Pages
- 2897-2913
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060485964
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.