The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mineralogy of the Martian interior up to core‐mantle boundary pressures
Open accessAbstract
In order to determine the mineralogy of the Martian interior along a high‐temperature areotherm, multianvil experiments have been performed with a model Martian mantle composition up to 23.5 GPa. The Dreibus and Wänke [1985] Martian mantle composition yields an upper mantle that consists of olivine + clinopyroxene + orthopyroxene + garnet at pressures up to 9 GPa. Above 9 GPa, orthopyroxene is no longer present. The transition zone is marked by the appearance of γ spinel at 13.5 GPa. Up to 15 GPa, clinopyroxene and majorite coexists with β phase and/or γ spinel. By 17 GPa, clinopyroxene is entirely replaced by majorite and the modal abundance of γ spinel increases at the expense of β phase. The dominant assemblage throughout most of the transition zone is γ spinel + majorite. Two experiments completed in the perovskite stability field indicate that the lower mantle consists of Mg‐Fe silicate‐perovskite, magnesiowüstite, and majorite. CaSiO 3‐perovskite is not present in these experiments. Both the presence of a Martian lower mantle, i.e., an Mg‐Fe silicate‐perovskite bearing zone, and the phase assemblage stable in the Martian lower mantle are very sensitive to the temperature profile of the interior. A low‐temperature profile may stabilize stishovite in the lower mantle or it may lead to the absence of the lower mantle because of the higher transition pressure required for forming perovskite at lower temperatures. Regardless of the temperature profile assumed, the Martian upper mantle and transition zone will account for a larger proportion of the planet's interior than is the case for the Earth's interior because of the smaller size of Mars.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Linked magma ocean solidification and atmospheric growth for Earth and Mars
Elkins-Tanton, L. T. (2008) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.062 · Cited by 589
Fei, Y., Van Orman, J., Li, J., van Westrenen, W., Sanloup, C., Minarik, W., Hirose, K., Komabayashi, T., Walter, M., & Funakoshi, K. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2003jb002562 · Cited by 462
Self-citationThe nakhlite meteorites: Augite-rich igneous rocks from Mars
Treiman, A. H. (2005) · Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2005.01.004 · Cited by 333
ELKINS‐TANTON, L. T., PARMENTIER, E. M., & HESS, P. C. (2003) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00013.x · Cited by 281
The interior structure of Mars: Implications from SNC meteorites
Sohl, F., & Spohn, T. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/96je03419 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertka, C. M., & Fei, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-03-10
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- B3
- Pages
- 5251-5264
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070884219
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mineralogy of the Martian interior up to core‐mantle boundary pressures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jb03270
- The paper
- Bertka, C. M., & Fei, Y. (1997). Mineralogy of the Martian interior up to core‐mantle boundary pressures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.