Cited by 837Ocean Waves and Remote SensingSoil Moisture and Remote SensingMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

A well‐calibrated ocean algorithm for special sensor microwave / imager

Wentz, Frank J.·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

I describe an algorithm for retrieving geophysical parameters over the ocean from special sensor microwave / imager (SSM/I) observations. This algorithm is based on a model for the brightness temperature TB of the ocean and intervening atmosphere. The retrieved parameters are the near‐surface wind speed W, the columnar water vapor V, the columnar cloud liquid water L, and the line‐of‐sight wind WLS. I restrict my analysis to ocean scenes free of rain, and when the algorithm detects rain, the retrievals are discarded. The model and algorithm are precisely calibrated using a very large in situ database containing 37,650 SSM/I overpasses of buoys and 35,108 overpasses of radiosonde sites. A detailed error analysis indicates that the TB model rms accuracy is between 0.5 and 1 K and that the rms retrieval accuracies for wind, vapor, and cloud are 0.9 ms−1, 1.2 mm, and 0.025 mm, respectively. The error in specifying the cloud temperature will introduce an additional 10% error in the cloud water retrieval. The spatial resolution for these accuracies is 50 km. The systematic errors in the retrievals are smaller than the rms errors, being about 0.3 ms−1, 0.6 mm, and 0.005 mm for W, V, and L, respectively. The one exception is the systematic error in wind speed of −1.0 ms−1 that occurs for observations within ±20° of upwind. The inclusion of the line‐of‐sight wind WLS in the retrieval significantly reduces the error in wind speed due to wind direction variations. The wind error for upw…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jc01751

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wentz, F. J.
Affiliations
Remote Sensing Systems (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Wentz, Frank J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
1997-04-15
Volume
102
Issue
C4
Pages
8703-8718
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964490911
Cited by
837
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 30
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Marshall Space Flight Center
  • NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
SSM/I, columnar water vapor, cloud liquid water, line-of-sight wind, cloud temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review