Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomass burning emissions and vertical distribution of atmospheric methyl halides and other reduced carbon gases in the South Atlantic region

Blake, Nicola J., Blake, Donald R., Sive, Barkley C., Chen, Tai‐Yih, Rowland, F. Sherwood, Collins, James E., Sachse, Glen W., Anderson, Bruce E.·1996·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The NASA TRACE A experiment (September – October 1992) investigated effects of dry season biomass burning emissions from both South America and southern Africa on the tropical South Atlantic troposphere. Whole air canister samples were collected aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft and analyzed for a wide range of nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and halocarbons. Fast response in situ quantification of CH 4, CO, and CO 2 were also performed on the DC‐8. Sampling took place over Brazilian agricultural areas and southern African savanna where there was active biomass burning. The vertical distribution of the measured gases revealed that the concentrations of most hydrocarbons, methyl halides, CH 4, CO, and CO 2, were enhanced in the boundary layer of these regions principally as a result of biomass fires. Brazilian and African biomass burning emission ratios were calculated for CH 3 Br, CH 3 Cl, CH 3 I, and NMHCs relative to CO and CO 2. Although both fire regions were dominated by efficient (flaming) combustion (CO/CO 2 ratios <0.1), the Brazilian samples exhibited the lower (more flaming) CO/CO 2 ratio of 0.037 compared with the African savanna value of 0.062. This difference in combustion efficiency was reflected in lower ratios versus CO 2 for all correlated gases. However, the gases more closely associated with smoldering combustion (e.g., C 3 H 8 and CH 3 Cl) exhibited significantly higher ratios relative to CO for the Brazilian fires, while the African samples exhibited higher values versus CO for compounds associated more closely with flaming combustion (e.g., C 2 H 2). This variation in the trace gas ratios versus CO is most likely caused by different fuel characteristics. On the basis of the emission ratios obtained, the total biomass burning emission rates for savannas and worldwide were calculated for the hydrocarbons and methyl halides. From these it was estimated that roughly 25% and 20% of global CH 3 Cl and CH 3 Br emissions, respectively, derive from biomass burning but that the contribution of biomass burning to total CH 3 I emissions was not significant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jd00561

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Blake, N. J., Blake, D. R., Sive, B. C., Chen, T., Rowland, F. S., Collins, J. E., Sachse, G. W., & Anderson, B. E.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1996-10
Volume
101
Issue
D19
Pages
24151-24164
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989438093
Cited by
213
References
1
FWCI
12.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass burning emissions and vertical distribution of atmospheric methyl halides and other reduced carbon gases in the South Atlantic region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jd00561
The paper
Blake, N. J., Blake, D. R., Sive, B. C., Chen, T., Rowland, F. S., Collins, J. E., Sachse, G. W., & Anderson, B. E. (1996). Biomass burning emissions and vertical distribution of atmospheric methyl halides and other reduced carbon gases in the South Atlantic region. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd00561

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.