Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A global three‐dimensional model of tropospheric sulfate

Open access
Chin, Mian, Jacob, Daniel J., Gardner, Geraldine M., Foreman‐Fowler, Michael S., Spiro, Peter A., Savoie, Dennis L.·1996·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

A three‐dimensional model is used to simulate the global tropospheric distributions of dimethylsulfide (DMS), SO 2, SO 42−, and methanesulfonic acid (MSA). The model uses meteorological input from a general circulation model (GCM) developed at the Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) with 4° × 5° horizontal resolution, nine layers in the vertical, and a time resolution of 4 hours. Model results are compared with observations from surface sites, ships, and aircraft. The model reproduces generally to within 30% the observed SO 2 and SO 42− concentrations over the United States and Europe; these concentrations are highly sensitive to the supply of H 2 O 2 as an in‐cloud SO 2 oxidant. Sulfate concentrations and wet deposition fluxes observed at remote marine sites can be accounted for using a global DMS source of 22 Tg S yr−1 in the model. However, this source overestimates DMS air concentrations by a factor of 2 unless we assume the presence of another DMS oxidant besides OH and NO 3. Inclusion of another DMS oxidant in our model also improves the simulation of the MSA to SO 42− concentration ratio in marine air. Simulated SO 42− concentrations in the northern hemispheric free troposphere are much lower than in previous global models and are more consistent with the few observations available. The difference reflects in part our accounting of efficient scavenging of SO 2 and SO 42− in wet convective updrafts. Global mean tropospheric lifetimes computed in our model are 1.0 days for DMS, 1.2 days for SO 2, 3.9 days for SO 42−, and 6.2 days for MSA. Fossil fuel combustion and industrial activities represent 68% of global non‐sea‐salt sulfur emissions. About 50% of SO 2 globally is converted to SO 42− aerosol (principally by in‐cloud oxidation) while the remainder is removed by deposition (30% by dry, 20% by wet). In‐cloud oxidation of SO 2 represents 85% of the global SO 42− source.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jd01221

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Chin, M., Jacob, D. J., Gardner, G. M., Foreman‐Fowler, M. S., Spiro, P. A., & Savoie, D. L.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1996-08
Volume
101
Issue
D13
Pages
18667-18690
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970099391
Cited by
373
References
1
FWCI
17.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.