The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models using222Rn and other short‐lived tracers
Open accessAbstract
Simulations of 222 Rn and other short‐lived tracers are used to evaluate and intercompare the representations of convective and synoptic processes in 20 global atmospheric transport models. Results show that most established three‐dimensional models simulate vertical mixing in the troposphere to within the constraints offered by the observed mean 222 Rn concentrations and that subgrid parameterization of convection is essential for this purpose. However, none of the models captures the observed variability of 222 Rn concentrations in the upper troposphere, and none reproduces the high 222 Rn concentrations measured at 200 hPa over Hawaii. The established three‐dimensional models reproduce the frequency and magnitude of high‐222 Rn episodes observed at Crozet Island in the Indian Ocean, demonstrating that they can resolve the synoptic‐scale transport of continental plumes with no significant numerical diffusion. Large differences between models are found in the rates of meridional transport in the upper troposphere (interhemispheric exchange, exchange between tropics and high latitudes). The four two‐dimensional models which participated in the intercomparison tend to underestimate the rate of vertical transport from the lower to the upper troposphere but show concentrations of 222 Rn in the lower troposphere that are comparable to the zonal mean values in the three‐dimensional models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of a two-dimensional global tropospheric model: model chemistry
Hough, A. M. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/90jd01327 · Cited by 169
Effect of ozone depletion on atmospheric CH4 and CO concentrations
Bekki, S., Law, K. S., & Pyle, J. A. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371595a0 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Cited by
Technical Note: The CCCma third generation AGCM and its extension into the middle atmosphere
Scinocca, J. F., McFarlane, N. A., Lazare, M., Li, J., & Plummer, D. (2008) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-8-7055-2008 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacob, D. J., Prather, M. J., Rasch, P. J., Shia, R., Balkanski, Y. J., Beagley, S. R., Bergmann, D. J., Blackshear, W. T., Brown, M., Chiba, M., Chipperfield, M. P., de Grandpré, J., Dignon, J. E., Feichter, J., Genthon, C., Grose, W. L., Kasibhatla, P. S., Köhler, I., Kritz, M. A., Law, K., Penner, J. E., Ramonet, M., Reeves, C. E., Rotman, D. A., Stockwell, D. Z., Van Velthoven, P. F. J., Verver, G., Wild, O., Yang, H., & Zimmermann, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- D5
- Pages
- 5953-5970
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083538237
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models using222Rn and other short‐lived tracers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jd02955
- The paper
- Jacob, D. J., Prather, M. J., Rasch, P. J., Shia, R., Balkanski, Y. J., Beagley, S. R., Bergmann, D. J., Blackshear, W. T., Brown, M., Chiba, M., Chipperfield, M. P., de Grandpré, J., Dignon, J. E., Feichter, J., Genthon, C., Grose, W. L., Kasibhatla, P. S., Köhler, I., Kritz, M. A., . . . Zimmermann, P. (1997). Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models using222Rn and other short‐lived tracers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd02955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.