The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Production and decay of ClNO2 from the reaction of gaseous N2O5 with NaCl solution: Bulk and aerosol experiments
Open accessAbstract
The chemistry of N 2 O 5 on liquid NaCl aerosols or bulk NaCl solutions was studied at 291 K by aerosol smog chamber and wetted‐wall flow tube experiments. The uptake of N 2 O 5 on deliquescent aerosol was obtained to be (3.2±0.2)×10−2 (1σ error) from the aerosol experiments. In the wetted‐wall flow tube we observed that nitryl chloride (ClNO 2) is the main product of the reaction at NaCl concentrations larger than approximately 0.5 M and almost the only product at concentrations larger than 1 M. The ClNO 2 yield does not depend linearly on the NaCl concentration, especially at small sodium chloride concentrations (i.e., smaller than 1 M). It appeared that a simple mechanism where N 2 O 5 undergoes two reaction channels (hydrolysis and reaction with Cl−) is unable to explain the observed concentration dependence of the product yield. We propose that N 2 O 5 dissociates to NO 2+ and NO 3− (rate constant kl>10 4 s−1) mainly. The directly hydrolysis of N 2 O 5 (k3[H 2 O]) is less than 20% of the total reaction. NO 2+ reacts with water to form 2H+ and NO 3− (k5) or with Cl− to form ClNO 2 (k4). Neglecting the influence of ionic strength we evaluate k4/k5 to be 836±32 (1σ error). Using the wetted‐wall flow tube technique, we studied the uptake of nitryl chloride by aqueous solutions containing NaCl. We observed that the uptake coefficient γ decreased from (4.84±0.13)×10−6 on pure water to (0.27±0.02)×10−6 on a 4.6 M NaCl solution. The sharp decrease of γ with increasing salt concentrations is evidence of reversible hydrolysis. ClNO 2 dissociates to Cl− + NO 2+(k6). In the absence of Cl− we evaluate H ⋅ k61/2 to be 0.44±0.01 mol L−1 atm−1 s−1/2. Finally, we discuss that atomic Cl from photolysis of ClNO 2 may play a role in the marine boundary layer at high northern latitudes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A large atomic chlorine source inferred from mid-continental reactive nitrogen chemistry
Thornton, J. A., Kercher, J. P., Riedel, T. P., Wagner, N. L., Cozic, J., Holloway, J. S., Dubé, W. P., Wolfe, G. M., Quinn, P. K., Middlebrook, A. M., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08905 · Cited by 652
Nighttime radical observations and chemistry
Brown, S. S., & Stutz, J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35181a · Cited by 637
High levels of nitryl chloride in the polluted subtropical marine boundary layer
Osthoff, H. D., Roberts, J. M., Ravishankara, A. R., Williams, E. J., Lerner, B. M., Sommariva, R., Bates, T. S., Coffman, D., Quinn, P. K., Dibb, J. E., et al. (2008) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo177 · Cited by 483
Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for water as solvent
Sander, R. (2023) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023 · Cited by 474
Bertram, T. H., & Thornton, J. A. (2009) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-9-8351-2009 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Behnke, W., George, C., Scheer, V., & Zetzsch, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- D3
- Pages
- 3795-3804
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007231403
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production and decay of ClNO2 from the reaction of gaseous N2O5 with NaCl solution: Bulk and aerosol experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jd03057
- The paper
- Behnke, W., George, C., Scheer, V., & Zetzsch, C. (1997). Production and decay of ClNO2 from the reaction of gaseous N2O5 with NaCl solution: Bulk and aerosol experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd03057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.