Oxygen extraction from lunar soils and pyroclastic glass
Abstract
We have conducted experiments on 16 lunar soils and three lunar pyroclastic glass samples to study the extraction of oxygen, an important resource for a future lunar base. The samples were chosen to span the range of composition, mineralogy, and maturity represented in the Apollo sample collection. Each sample was reduced in flowing hydrogen for 3 hours at 1050°C. The dominant effect was reduction of Fe 2+ (as FeO) in minerals and glass to iron metal, with concomitant release of oxygen. Oxygen extraction was strongly correlated with initial Fe 2+ abundance. The data and supporting experiments also indicate extraction of oxygen from TiO 2 and SiO 2 . No dependence of oxygen release on sample maturity could be identified. Oxygen was extracted, in decreasing order of efficiency, from ilmenite, agglutinitic and pyroclastic glass, olivine, and pyroxene. The experimental reduction of lunar soil provides a method for assessing the oxygen production potential for sites on the lunar surface from lunar orbit. Our results show that oxygen yield from the regolith can be predicted from knowledge of only one parameter, total iron content. This parameter can be measured from orbit by gamma ray spectrometry or multispectral imaging. These experimental data also support the selection of feedstocks and operating parameters for a lunar oxygen plant.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sintering micro-trusses in a hydrogen environment may not necessarily result in a peak strength increase, but it has practical applications in oxygen and water collection for human use on the Moon through reduction of ilmenite to metallic iron by hydrogen.
“Sintering micro-trusses in a hydrogen environment may not necessarily result in a peak strength increase, but it has practical applications in oxygen and water collection for human use on the Moon through a reduction process of the ilmenite ( FeTiO 3 ) mineral found in Lunar regolith to metallic iron by hydrogen [94,256-258].”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [256]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Allen, C. C., Morris, R. V., & McKay, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- E11
- Pages
- 26085-26095
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090097066
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
- Keywords
- lunar regolith, hydrogen reduction, iron reduction, Fe2+ content, oxygen yield, ilmenite, olivine, pyroxene, titanium dioxide, silica, Apollo samples, in-situ resource utilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review