Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models

Open access
Kuczera, George·1997·Water Resources Research

Abstract

The estimation of catchment model parameters has proven to be a difficult task for several reasons, which include ill‐posedness and the existence of multiple local optima. Recent work on global probabilistic search methods has developed robust techniques for locating the global optimum. However, these methods can be computationally intensive when the search is conducted over a large hypercube. Moreover, specification of the hypercube may be problematic, particularly if there is strong parameter interaction. This study seeks to reduce the computational effort by confining the search to a subspace within which the global optimum is likely to be found. The approach involves locating a local optimum using a local gradient‐based search. It is assumed that the local optimum belongs to a set of optima which cluster about the global optimum. A probabilistic search is then conducted within a hyperellipsoid defined by the second‐order approximation to the response surface around the local optimum. A case study involving a five‐parameter conceptual rainfall‐runoff model is presented. The response surface is shown to be riddled with local optima, yet the second‐order approximation provides a not unreasonable description of parameter uncertainty. The subspace search strategy provides a rational means for defining the search space and is shown to be more efficient (typically twice, but up to 5 times more efficient) than a search over a hypercube. Four probabilistic search algorithms are compared: shuffled complex evolution (SCE), genetic algorithm using traditional crossover, and multiple random start using either simplex or quasi‐Newton local searches. In the case study the SCE algorithm was found to be robust and the most efficient. The genetic algorithm, although displaying initial convergence rates superior to the SCE algorithm, tended to flounder near the optimum and could not be relied upon to locate the global optimum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96wr02671

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Kuczera, G.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
1997-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
177-185
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W2171586167
Cited by
198
References
1
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96wr02671
The paper
Kuczera, G. (1997). Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/96wr02671

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.