The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models
Open accessAbstract
The estimation of catchment model parameters has proven to be a difficult task for several reasons, which include ill‐posedness and the existence of multiple local optima. Recent work on global probabilistic search methods has developed robust techniques for locating the global optimum. However, these methods can be computationally intensive when the search is conducted over a large hypercube. Moreover, specification of the hypercube may be problematic, particularly if there is strong parameter interaction. This study seeks to reduce the computational effort by confining the search to a subspace within which the global optimum is likely to be found. The approach involves locating a local optimum using a local gradient‐based search. It is assumed that the local optimum belongs to a set of optima which cluster about the global optimum. A probabilistic search is then conducted within a hyperellipsoid defined by the second‐order approximation to the response surface around the local optimum. A case study involving a five‐parameter conceptual rainfall‐runoff model is presented. The response surface is shown to be riddled with local optima, yet the second‐order approximation provides a not unreasonable description of parameter uncertainty. The subspace search strategy provides a rational means for defining the search space and is shown to be more efficient (typically twice, but up to 5 times more efficient) than a search over a hypercube. Four probabilistic search algorithms are compared: shuffled complex evolution (SCE), genetic algorithm using traditional crossover, and multiple random start using either simplex or quasi‐Newton local searches. In the case study the SCE algorithm was found to be robust and the most efficient. The genetic algorithm, although displaying initial convergence rates superior to the SCE algorithm, tended to flounder near the optimum and could not be relied upon to locate the global optimum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters
Marquardt, D. W. (1963) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0111030 · Cited by 30,728
Cited by
PRMS-IV, the precipitation-runoff modeling system, version 4
Markstrom, S. L., Regan, R. S., Hay, L. E., Viger, R. J., Webb, R. M., Payn, R. A., & LaFontaine, J. H. (2015) · Techniques and Methods · doi:10.3133/tm6b7 · Cited by 277
The location optimization of electric vehicle charging stations considering charging behavior
Tian, Z., Hou, W., Gu, X., Gu, F., & Yao, B. (2018) · SIMULATION · doi:10.1177/0037549717743807 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuczera, G.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 177-185
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2171586167
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96wr02671
- The paper
- Kuczera, G. (1997). Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/96wr02671
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.