The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fully adiabatic changes in storm time relativistic electron fluxes
Open accessAbstract
It has been suggested that much of the drop and subsequent recovery of storm time relativistic electron fluxes at geosynchronous orbit can be explained in terms of a fully adiabatic response (all three adiabatic invariants conserved) to magnetic field changes. To calculate this effect, we assume a prestorm electron flux distribution constructed from CRRES satellite data, we use modular magnetospheric magnetic field models to represent the magnetic field configuration before and during the storm, and we use Liouville's theorem to evolve the prestorm electron flux. In this work we focus on the important special case of equatorially mirroring electrons. During the main phase of a storm with a Dst minimum of −100 nT we find that the fully adiabatic effect can cause a flux decrease of up to 2 orders of magnitude, consistent with observed flux decreases. We also find that the magnitude of the fully adiabatic flux decrease is larger for lower energies, again in agreement with observations. The contribution of prestorm electron fluxes to the recovery phase flux increase at synchronous orbit is expected to be small because of losses to the dawnside magnetopause. A comparison of fully adiabatic fluxes with measured electron fluxes for the November 2–5, 1993, storm indicates that for this event the fully adiabatic effect may be contributing to the observed decrease but that nonadiabatic effects are clearly important. Overall we conclude that the fully adiabatic effect can account for a significant fraction of observed flux decreases and that differences between the observed and the fully adiabatic fluxes help to clarify when and where additional loss and source mechanisms exist.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Summers, D., & Thorne, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/2002ja009489 · Cited by 733
Summers, D., Ni, B., & Meredith, N. P. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/2006ja011993 · Cited by 560
Meredith, N. P., Thorne, R. M., Horne, R. B., Summers, D., Fraser, B. J., & Anderson, R. R. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/2002ja009700 · Cited by 434
Outward radial diffusion driven by losses at magnetopause
Shprits, Y. Y., Thorne, R. M., Friedel, R., Reeves, G. D., Fennell, J., Baker, D. N., & Kanekal, S. G. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/2006ja011657 · Cited by 375
Earth's Van Allen Radiation Belts: From Discovery to the Van Allen Probes Era
Li, W., & Hudson, M. K. (2019) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/2018ja025940 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H., & Chan, A. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- A10
- Pages
- 22107-22116
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058817053
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fully adiabatic changes in storm time relativistic electron fluxes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97ja01814
- The paper
- Kim, H., & Chan, A. A. (1997). Fully adiabatic changes in storm time relativistic electron fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/97ja01814
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.