The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strengths of serpentinite gouges at elevated temperatures
Open accessAbstract
Serpentinite has been proposed as a cause of both low strength and aseismic creep of fault zones. To test these hypotheses, we have measured the strength of chrysotile‐, lizardite‐, and antigorite‐rich serpentinite gouges under hydrothermal conditions, with emphasis on chrysotile, which has thus far received little attention. At 25°C, the coefficient of friction, μ, of chrysotile gouge is roughly 0.2, whereas the lizardite‐ and antigorite‐rich gouges are at least twice as strong. The very low room temperature strength of chrysotile is a consequence of its unusually high adsorbed water content. When the adsorbed water is removed, chrysotile is as strong as pure antigorite gouge at room temperature. Heating to ∼200°C causes the frictional strengths of all three gouges to increase. Limited data suggest that different polytypes of a given serpentine mineral have similar strengths; thus deformation‐induced changes in polytype should not affect fault strength. At 25°C, the chrysotile gouge has a transition from velocity strengthening at low velocities to velocity weakening at high velocities, consistent with previous studies. At temperatures up to ∼200°C, however, chrysotile strength is essentially independent of velocity at low velocities. Overall, chrysotile has a restricted range of velocity‐strengthening behavior that migrates to higher velocities with increasing temperature. Less information on velocity dependence is available for the lizardite and antigorite gouges, but their behavior is consistent with that outlined for chrysotile. The marked changes in velocity dependence and strength of chrysotile with heating underscore the hazards of using room temperature data to predict fault behavior at depth. The velocity behavior at elevated temperatures does not rule out serpentinite as a cause of aseismic slip, but in the presence of a hydrostatic fluid pressure gradient, all varieties of serpentine are too strong to explain the apparent weakness of faults such as the San Andreas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wenner, D. B., & Taylor, H. P. (1971) · Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · doi:10.1007/bf00643332 · Cited by 405
Cited by
The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting
Scholz, C. H. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316681473 · Cited by 910
Serpentinization of the forearc mantle
Hyndman, R. D., & Peacock, S. M. (2003) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00263-2 · Cited by 907
Kopf, A. J. (2002) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2000rg000093 · Cited by 869
Oleskevich, D. A., Hyndman, R. D., & Wang, K. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/1999jb900060 · Cited by 577
The effect of mineral bond strength and adsorbed water on fault gouge frictional strength
Morrow, C. A., Moore, D. E., & Lockner, D. A. (2000) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/1999gl008401 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, D. E., Lockner, D. A., Ma, S., Summers, R., & Byerlee, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-07-10
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- B7
- Pages
- 14787-14801
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064798340
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strengths of serpentinite gouges at elevated temperatures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97jb00995
- The paper
- Moore, D. E., Lockner, D. A., Ma, S., Summers, R., & Byerlee, J. D. (1997). Strengths of serpentinite gouges at elevated temperatures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jb00995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.