The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seismic anisotropy of oceanic upper mantle: Shear wave splitting methodologies and observations
Open accessAbstract
We develop methodologies to obtain accurate measurements of shear wave splitting and apply these techniques to examine the pattern of oceanic upper mantle anisotropy. To obtain high‐quality estimates of receiver splitting at island stations, we devise a stacking method that finds the optimum splitting parameters and 95% error region for teleseismic shear‐wave phases from a suite of earthquake events. To obtain additional measurements in oceanic regions, we develop techniques to measure splitting parameters and errors for SS phases that sample upper mantle anisotropy at their bounce points. However, we find the data are often of low resolution, and anomalous characteristics are sometimes found that make splitting difficult to interpret. Ten second splitting of SS is observed across the BANJO seismic array, but we cannot unambiguously attribute this signal to mantle anisotropy at the bounce. The receiver splitting methods are used to assess the adequacy of a two anisotropic layer model for the Pacific region, with fast polarization azimuth (ϕ) in the lithosphere oriented in the fossil spreading direction and ϕ in the asthenosphere oriented in the absolute plate motion direction. This model has been proposed to explain surface wave data in the Pacific Ocean, but our splitting results demonstrate that oceanic anisotropy patterns are more heterogeneous than would be predicted. While the island splitting measurements could reflect the influence of individual hotspot upwellings, hotspot effects do not appear to be universally dominant. We propose that splitting observations alternatively indicate broad‐scale differences in the underlying character of oceanic upper mantle anisotropy, associated with coherant patters of lithospheric structure and asthenospheric flow. In particular, splitting, surface wave models, and regional studies all support a model where lithospheric anisotropy throughout the South Pacific has been erased or reoriented toward the absolute plate motion direction, whereas more limited observations in the North Pacific indicate that the fossil lithospheric signature appears to be preserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: What have we learned from shear wave splitting?
Savage, M. K. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/98rg02075 · Cited by 1,312
A Complex Pattern of Mantle Flow in the Lau Backarc
Smith, G. P., Wiens, D. A., Fischer, K. M., Dorman, L. M., Webb, S. C., & Hildebrand, J. A. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058763 · Cited by 274
Seismic anisotropy beneath stable continental interiors
Fouch, M. J., & Rondenay, S. (2006) · Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2006.03.024 · Cited by 273
Mantle Flow Pattern Associated With the Patagonian Slab Window Determined From Azimuthal Anisotropy
Ben‐Mansour, W., Wiens, D. A., Mark, H. F., Russo, R. M., Richter, A., Marderwald, E., & Barrientos, S. (2022) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2022gl099871 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfe, C. J., & Silver, P. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-01-10
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- B1
- Pages
- 749-771
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067396291
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seismic anisotropy of oceanic upper mantle: Shear wave splitting methodologies and observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97jb02023
- The paper
- Wolfe, C. J., & Silver, P. G. (1998). Seismic anisotropy of oceanic upper mantle: Shear wave splitting methodologies and observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jb02023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.