The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5°
Abstract
We present a new global model for the Earth's crust based on seismic refraction data published in the period 1948–1995 and a detailed compilation of ice and sediment thickness. An extensive compilation of seismic refraction measurements has been used to determine the crustal structure on continents and their margins. Oceanic crust is modeled with both a standard model for normal oceanic crust, and variants for nonstandard regions, such as oceanic plateaus. Our model (CRUST 5.1) consists of 2592 5° × 5° tiles in which the crust and uppermost mantle are described by eight layers: (1) ice, (2) water, (3) soft sediments, (4) hard sediments, (5) crystalline upper, (6) middle, (7) lower crust, and (8) uppermost mantle. Topography and bathymetry are adopted from a standard database (ETOPO‐5). Compressional wave velocity in each layer is based on field measurements, and shear wave velocity and density are estimated using recently published empirical Vp‐ Vs and Vp‐density relationships. The crustal model differs from previous models in that (1) the thickness and seismic/density structure of sedimentary basins is accounted for more completely, (2) the velocity structure of unmeasured regions is estimated using statistical averages that are based on a significantly larger database of crustal structure, (3) the compressional wave, shear wave, and density structure have been explicitly specified using newly available constraints from field and laboratory studies. Thus this global crustal model is based on substantially more data than previous models and differs from them in many important respects. A new map of the thickness of the Earth's crust is presented, and we illustrate the application of this model by using it to provide the crustal correction for surface wave phase velocity maps. Love waves at 40 s are dominantly sensitive to crustal structure, and there is a very close correspondence between observed phase velocities at this period and those predicted by CRUST 5.1. We find that the application of crustal corrections to long‐period (167 s) Rayleigh waves significantly increases the variance in the phase velocity maps and strengthens the upper mantle velocity anomalies beneath stable continental regions. A simple calculation of crustal isostacy indicates significant lateral variations in upper mantle density. The model CRUST 5.1 provides a complete description of the physical properties of the Earth's crust at a scale of 5° × 5° and can be used for a wide range of seismological and nonseismological problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: A global view
Christensen, N. I., & Mooney, W. D. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/95jb00259 · Cited by 2,952
Self-citationOceanic crustal thickness versus spreading rate
Chen, Y. J. (1992) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/92gl00161 · Cited by 213
Cited by
The continental record and the generation of continental crust
Cawood, P. A., Hawkesworth, C. J., & Dhuime, B. (2013) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b30722.1 · Cited by 722
Mantle shear–wave tomography and the fate of subducted slabs
Grand, S. P. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2002.1077 · Cited by 624
Artemieva, I. M. (2006) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2005.11.022 · Cited by 526
Heterogeneity and Anisotropy of Earth's Inner Core
Deuss, A. (2014) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-054658 · Cited by 114
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Mooney, W. D., Laske, G., & Masters, T. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-01-10
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- B1
- Pages
- 727-747
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026562834
- Cited by
- 1,029
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 78.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5°. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97jb02122
- The paper
- Mooney, W. D., Laske, G., & Masters, T. G. (1998). CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5°. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jb02122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.