The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ERS‐1/2 orbit improvement using TOPEX/POSEIDON: The 2 cm challenge
Abstract
The ERS orbit error reduction method using TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) data as a reference [Le Traon et al., 1995a] was applied to ERS‐1 cycles from phases C, E, F, and G and to the first 16 cycles of the ERS‐2 mission (phase A). T/P M‐GDR (geophysical data record) (version C) and ERS‐1/2 ocean product (OPR) data were used. ERS‐1/2 orbits are the D‐PAF (processing and archiving facility) orbits and, when necessary, ERS‐1/2 altimetric corrections were updated to make the T/P and ERS‐1/2 corrections homogeneous. The adjustment method has been refined, and formal error on the estimation is now calculated. The ERS‐1/2 orbit error estimation is thus estimated to be precise to within about 2 cm root‐mean‐square (rms). E‐E crossover differences are reduced from 12 to 17 cm to only 6.5 cm rms for all processed cycles. Similarly, the T/P‐E crossover differences are reduced from 11 to 14 cm to only 7 cm rms. The adjusted D‐PAF orbit error varies between 6 and 12 cm rms. The adjustment has also been performed for the Joint Gravity Model 3(JGM 3) orbits of ERS‐I phases C, E, and F. The rms difference between the corrected orbits for the D‐PAF and JGM 3 orbits is only about 1 cm rms, while it is about 11 cm before T/P orbit error correction. This shows that the adjustment is almost insensitive to the initial ERS‐I orbit used. It also confirms the 2 cm precision of the method. We also do repeat‐track analysis on the 35 day repeat cycles of ERS‐I phase C. The mean difference in sea level variance before and after orbit error correction is 34 cm2 (D‐PAF orbit) and 17 cm2 (JGM 3 orbit). The corrected ERS‐1 and T/P sea level variabilities, however, are in excellent agreement. The study thus shows that ERS‐1/2 orbit error must be corrected before analyzing large‐scale oceanic signals and combining ERS‐1/2 with T/P data. The proposed method provides a very effective correction and thus significantly enhances the quality of ERS‐1/2 data. Corresponding data sets will be distributed to the scientific community by Archiving, Validation, and Interpretation of Satellite Oceanographic Data (AVISO).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TOPEX/POSEIDON mission overview
Fu, L., Christensen, E. J., Yamarone, C. A., Lefebvre, M., Ménard, Y., Dorrer, M., & Escudier, P. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/94jc01761 · Cited by 735
New Computations of the Tide-generating Potential
Cartwright, D. E., & Tayler, R. J. (2007) · Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1971.tb01803.x · Cited by 561
Corrected Tables of Tidal Harmonics
Cartwright, D. E., & Edden, A. C. (1973) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1973.tb03420.x · Cited by 507
Tapley, B. D., Watkins, M. M., Ries, J. C., Davis, G. W., Eanes, R. J., Poole, S. R., Rim, H. J., Schutz, B. E., Shum, C. K., Nerem, R. S., et al. (1996) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/96jb01645 · Cited by 312
Using Topex/Poseidon Data to EnhanceERS-1Data
Traon, P. L., Gaspar, P., Bouyssel, F., & Makhmara, H. (1995) · Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0161:utdted>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 103
Hernández, F., Traon, P. L., & Morrow, R. A. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/95jc02333 · Cited by 58
Satellites work in tandem to improve accuracy of data
Traon, P. L., Gaspar, P., Ogor, F., & Dorandeu, J. (1995) · Eos · doi:10.1029/95eo00235 · Cited by 11
Self-citation(1998) · doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0522:aimmom>2.0.co;2
Cited by
Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies
Chelton, D. B., Schlax, M. G., & Samelson, R. M. (2011) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2011.01.002 · Cited by 2,622
Global high-resolution mapping of ocean circulation from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-1 and -2
Ducet, N., Le Traon, P. Y., & Reverdin, G. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2000jc900063 · Cited by 1,725
Rio, M. ‐., & Hernandez, F. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2003jc002226 · Cited by 485
Eddy activity in the four major upwelling systems from satellite altimetry (1992-2007).
Chaigneau, A., Eldin, G., & Dewitte, B. (2009) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.012 · Cited by 334
Ocean climate of the South East Atlantic observed from satellite data and wind models
Hardman-Mountford, N. J., Richardson, A. J., Agenbag, J. J., Hagen, E., Nykjaer, L., Shillington, F. A., & Villacastin, C. (2003) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2003.10.001 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Le Traon, P. ‐., & Ogor, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-04-15
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- C4
- Pages
- 8045-8057
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097186989
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERS‐1/2 orbit improvement using TOPEX/POSEIDON: The 2 cm challenge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97jc01917
- The paper
- Le Traon, P. ‐., & Ogor, F. (1998). ERS‐1/2 orbit improvement using TOPEX/POSEIDON: The 2 cm challenge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jc01917
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.