Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy exchanges of a boreal black spruce forest

Jarvis, P. G., Massheder, J. M., Hale, S. E., Moncrieff, J. B., Rayment, M., Scott, S. L.·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Measurements of the fluxes of latent heat λ E, sensible heat H, and CO 2 were made by eddy covariance in a boreal black spruce forest as part of the Boreal Ecosystem‐Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) for 120 days through the growing season in 1994. BOREAS is a multiscale study in which satellite, airborne, stand‐scale, and leaf‐scale observations were made in relation to the major vegetation types [Sellers et al., 1995]. The eddy covariance system comprised a sonic anemometer mounted 27 m above the forest, a system for transferring air rapidly and coherently to a closed path, infrared gas analyzer and a computer with the Edinburgh EdiSol software. Over the measurement period, closure of the energy balance on a 24 hour basis was good: (H + λ E)/(R n ‐ G ‐ B ‐ S) = 0.97. The midday Bowen ratio was typically in the range 1.0–2.5, with an average value of ∼1.9 in the first Intensive Field Campaign (IFCl) and 1.3–1.4 in IFC2 and IFC3. Daily ecosystem evapotranspiration from moss, understory, and trees followed daily net radiation. Mean half‐hourly net ecosystem flux followed photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) closely, reaching −9 μmol m−2 s−1 in June and August. The mean respiratory efflux on nights during which the atmosphere was well mixed (u*>0.4 m s−1) reached 6 μmol m−2 s−1. The PPFD‐saturated biotic CO 2 assimilation reached 20 μmol; m−2 s−1 and showed little response to air temperature or vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Storage of CO 2 in the air column at night did not account adequately for respiration on stable nights, so nighttime efflux was modeled for periods when u*<0.4 m s−1. There was a net gain of CO 2 on most of the 120 days, but on 31 days of high temperature or low PPFD there was a net carbon loss. High PPFD promoted influx of CO 2 by the foliage, whereas high temperatures reduced net CO 2 influx through high respiration rates by the roots and soil microorganisms, leading to lower net uptake at high PPFD. Over the 120 day period, 95 g m−2 of C were stored (an average of 0.8 g m−2 d−1), and 237 mm of water evaporated (an average of 2 mm d−1).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/97jd01176

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Jarvis, P. G., Massheder, J. M., Hale, S. E., Moncrieff, J. B., Rayment, M., & Scott, S. L.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1997-12
Volume
102
Issue
D24
Pages
28953-28966
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054790599
Cited by
333
References
0
FWCI
31.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy exchanges of a boreal black spruce forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97jd01176
The paper
Jarvis, P. G., Massheder, J. M., Hale, S. E., Moncrieff, J. B., Rayment, M., & Scott, S. L. (1997). Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy exchanges of a boreal black spruce forest. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd01176

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.