Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diel variability of soluble Fe(II) and soluble total Fe in North African dust in the trade winds at Barbados

Zhu, X. R., Prospero, J. M., Millero, F. J.·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

There is increased interest in the deposition of wind‐transported mineral dust to the oceans because of the possible role that iron might play as a limiting nutrient in primary productivity. It has been suggested that photochemical processes taking place on mineral particles suspended in the atmosphere could reduce large fractions of the Fe(III) to Fe(II) and thereby increase the soluble fraction of iron; when the particle is deposited in the ocean, the soluble iron would be more readily available to chemical and biological processes. In this study we collected mineral aerosol (carried by the trade winds from North African sources) at Barbados over a diel cycle; we immediately measured Fe(II) and total soluble Fe in filter extracts using as the extractant an acidic saline solution comparable to that expected to be present on mineral aerosols in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. The concentration of mineral dust was quite variable during the experiment, ranging from 1.99 to 18.4 μg/m 3 (mean, 6.59 μg/ m 3); Fe constituted on average 3.4% of the mineral dust mass. On average, 6.2% of the Fe in the dust was extracted in our process. The concentration of total dissolved Fe varied within a relatively narrow range, closely tracking the variations in dust concentration with no apparent day/night pattern. In contrast, there was a clear day/night pattern in the concentration of soluble Fe(II), with day values (mean 3.7 ng m−3) about twice night values (1.5 ng m m−3); expressed as a fraction of total dissolved Fe, Fe(II) ranged from 5.1% to 55% in the entire (day and night) data set (mean, 25%). Thus soluble Fe(II) constitutes only a small fraction (mean 1.6%) of the total Fe in the mineral aerosol. Furthermore, the Fe(II) concentration varied independently of the concentration of soluble Fe. The well‐defined diel cycle that we observed demonstrates that photochemical processing of Fe does take place; the relatively small dissolved Fe fractions and the absence of a relationship between Fe(II) and total dissolved Fe suggest, however, that the photochemical processes in mineral aerosols do not have a substantial effect on the total Fe solubility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/97jd01313

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, X. R., Prospero, J. M., & Millero, F. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1997-09
Volume
102
Issue
D17
Pages
21297-21305
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991778269
Cited by
194
References
1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diel variability of soluble Fe(II) and soluble total Fe in North African dust in the trade winds at Barbados. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97jd01313
The paper
Zhu, X. R., Prospero, J. M., & Millero, F. J. (1997). Diel variability of soluble Fe(II) and soluble total Fe in North African dust in the trade winds at Barbados. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd01313

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.