The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moss and soil contributions to the annual net carbon flux of a maturing boreal forest
Open accessAbstract
We used input and decomposition data from 14 C studies of soils to determine rates of vertical accumulation of moss combined with carbon storage inventories on a sequence of burns to model how carbon accumulates in soils and moss after a stand‐killing fire. We used soil drainage—moss associations and soil drainage maps of the old black spruce (OBS) site at the BOREAS northern study area (NSA) to areally weight the contributions of each moderately well drained, feathermoss areas; poorly drained sphagnum—feathermoss areas; and very poorly drained brown moss areas to the carbon storage and flux at the OBS NSA site. On this very old (117 years) complex of black spruce, sphagnum bog veneer, and fen systems we conclude that these systems are likely sequestering 0.01–0.03 kg C m−2 yr−1 at OBS‐NSA today. Soil drainage in boreal forests near Thompson, Manitoba, controls carbon storage and flux by controlling moss input and decomposition rates and by controlling through fire the amount and quality of carbon left after burning. On poorly drained soils rich in sphagnum moss, net accumulation and long‐term storage of carbon is higher than on better drained soils colonized by feathermosses. The carbon flux of these contrasting ecosystems is best characterized by soil drainage class and stand age, where stands recently burned are net sources of CO 2, and maturing stands become increasingly stronger sinks of atmospheric CO 2. This approach to measuring carbon storage and flux presents a method of scaling to larger areas using soil drainage, moss cover, and stand age information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B. H., Holland, E. A., McKeown, R., Ojima, D. S., Painter, T. H., Parton, W. J., & Townsend, A. R. (1994) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/94gb00993 · Cited by 1,060
Cited by
Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest
Nilsson, M.-C., & Wardle, D. A. (2005) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0421:uvaafe]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 835
The Role of Bryophytes in Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling
Turetsky, M. R. (2003) · The Bryologist · doi:10.1639/05 · Cited by 561
Forest restoration following surface mining disturbance: challenges and solutions
Macdonald, S. E., Landhäusser, S. M., Skousen, J., Franklin, J., Frouz, J., Hall, S., Jacobs, D. F., & Quideau, S. (2015) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-015-9506-4 · Cited by 384
The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget
Harden, J. W., Trumbore, S. E., Stocks, B. J., Hirsch, A., Gower, S. T., O'neill, K. P., & Kasischke, E. S. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06019.x · Cited by 387
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Harden, J. W., O'Neill, K. P., Trumbore, S. E., Veldhuis, H., & Stocks, B. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- D24
- Pages
- 28805-28816
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970546243
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moss and soil contributions to the annual net carbon flux of a maturing boreal forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97jd02237
- The paper
- Harden, J. W., O'Neill, K. P., Trumbore, S. E., Veldhuis, H., & Stocks, B. J. (1997). Moss and soil contributions to the annual net carbon flux of a maturing boreal forest. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd02237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.