The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Permeability within basaltic oceanic crust
Abstract
Water‐rock interactions within the seafloor are responsible for significant energy and solute fluxes between basaltic oceanic crust and the overlying ocean. Permeability is the primary hydrologic property controlling the form, intensity, and duration of seafloor fluid circulation, but after several decades of characterizing shallow oceanic basement, we are still learning how permeability is created and distributed and how it changes as the crust ages. Core‐scale measurements of basaltic oceanic crust yield permeabilities that are quite low (generally 10−22 to 10−17 m²), while in situ measurements in boreholes suggest an overlapping range of values extending several orders of magnitude higher (10−18 to 10−13 m²). Additional indirect estimates include calculations made from borehole temperature and flow meter logs (10−16 to 10−11 m²), numerical models of coupled heat and fluid flow at the ridge crest and within ridge flanks (10−16 to 10−9 m²), and several other methods. Qualitative indications of permeability within the basaltic oceanic crust come from an improved understanding of crustal stratigraphy and patterns of alteration and tectonic modification seen in ophiolites, seafloor samples and boreholes. Difficulties in reconciling the wide range of estimated permeabilities arise from differences in experimental scale and critical assumptions regarding the nature and distribution of fluid flow. Many observations and experimental and modeling results are consistent with permeability varying with depth into basement and with primary basement lithology. Permeability also seems to be highly heterogeneous and anisotropic throughout much of the basaltic crust, as within crystalline rocks in general. A series of focused experiments is required to resolve permeability in shallow oceanic basement and to directly couple upper crustal hydrogeology to magmatic, tectonic, and geochemical crustal evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some remarks on heat flow and gravity anomalies
McKenzie, D. P. (1967) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz072i024p06261 · Cited by 751
Oceanic crustal thickness versus spreading rate
Chen, Y. J. (1992) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/92gl00161 · Cited by 213
Cited by
An inverted continental Moho and serpentinization of the forearc mantle
Bostock, M. G., Hyndman, R. D., Rondenay, S., & Peacock, S. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417536a · Cited by 632
Carbon dioxide cycling and implications for climate on ancient Earth
Sleep, N. H., & Zahnle, K. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2000je001247 · Cited by 592
Volcanoes, Fluids, and Life at Mid-Ocean Ridge Spreading Centers
Kelley, D. S., Baross, J. A., & Delaney, J. R. (2002) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.30.091201.141331 · Cited by 463
Carbon dioxide sequestration in deep-sea basalt
Goldberg, D. S., Takahashi, T., & Slagle, A. L. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804397105 · Cited by 337
von Huene, R., Ranero, C. R., Weinrebe, W., & Hinz, K. (2000) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/1999tc001143 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, A. T.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-182
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2055044852
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Permeability within basaltic oceanic crust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97rg02916
- The paper
- Fisher, A. T. (1998). Permeability within basaltic oceanic crust. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/97rg02916
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.