The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow
Open accessAbstract
Sediment influx to channel networks is stochastically driven by rainstorms and other perturbations, which are discrete in time and space and which occur on a landscape with its own spatial variability in topography, colluvium properties, and state of recovery from previous disturbances. The resulting stochastic field of sediment supply interacts with the topology of the channel network and with transport processes to generate spatial and temporal patterns of flux and storage that characterize the sedimentation regime of a drainage basin. The regime varies systematically with basin area. We describe how the stochastic sediment supply is generated by climatic, topographic, geotechnical, and biotic controls that vary between regions. The general principle is illustrated through application to a landscape where sediment is supplied by mass wasting, and the forcing variables are deterministic thickening of colluvium, random sequences of root‐destroying wildfires, and random sequences of rainstorms that trigger failure in a population of landslide source areas with spatial variance in topography and colluvium strength. Landslides stop in channels or convert to scouring debris flows, depending on the nature of the low‐order channel network. Sediment accumulates within these channels for centuries before being transferred downstream by debris flows. Time series of sediment supply, transport, and storage vary with basin scale for any combination of climatic, topographic, and geotechnical controls. In a companion paper [Benda and Dunne, this issue] we use simulations of timing, volumes, and locations of mass wasting to study the interaction between a stochastically forced sediment supply and systematic changes of storage and flux through channel networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems
GOMI, T., SIDLE, R. C., & RICHARDSON, J. S. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0905:upadlo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 841
Process-based Principles for Restoring River Ecosystems
Beechie, T. J., Sear, D. A., Olden, J. D., Pess, G. R., Buffington, J. M., Moir, H., Roni, P., & Pollock, M. M. (2010) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.7 · Cited by 785
Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., & Dietrich, W. E. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900090 · Cited by 705
Current research issues related to post-wildfire runoff and erosion processes
Moody, J. A., Shakesby, R. A., Robichaud, P. R., Cannon, S. H., & Martin, D. A. (2013) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.03.004 · Cited by 693
The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal
Roback, K., Clark, M. K., West, A. J., Zekkos, D., Li, G., Gallen, S. F., Chamlagain, D., & Godt, J. W. (2018) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.030 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Benda, L., & Dunne, T.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2849-2863
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2129067208
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/97wr02388
- The paper
- Benda, L., & Dunne, T. (1997). Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/97wr02388
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.