Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Landsliding and the evolution of normal‐fault‐bounded mountains

Open access
Densmore, Alexander L., Ellis, Michael A., Anderson, Robert S.·1998·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Much of the tectonic and climatic history in high‐relief regions, such as the mountains of the western U.S. Basin and Range province, is contained in the morphology of hillslopes, drainage networks, and other landforms that range in scale from 10−1 to 10 1 km. To understand how these landforms evolve, we have developed a numerical landscape evolution model that combines a detailed tectonic displacement field with a set of physically based geomorphic rules. Bedrock landsliding, long recognized as a significant geomorphic process in mountainous topography, is for the first time explicitly included in the rule set. In a series of numerical experiments, we generate synthetic landscapes that closely resemble mountainous topography observed in the Basin and Range. The production of realistic landscapes depends critically on the presence of bedrock landslides, and landsliding yields rates of long‐term erosion that are comparable in magnitude to those of fluvial erosion. The erosive efficiency of bedrock landsliding implies that hillslopes may respond very quickly to changes in local base level and that fluvial erosion is the rate‐limiting process in steady state experimental landscapes, Our experiments generate power law distributions of landslide sizes, somewhat similar to both field and laboratory observations. Thus even a simple model of bedrock landsliding is capable of quantitatively reproducing mountainous topography and landslide distributions and represents a significant step forward in our understanding of the evolution of normal‐fault‐bounded ranges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/98jb00510

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Densmore, A. L., Ellis, M. A., & Anderson, R. S.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1998-07-10
Volume
103
Issue
B7
Pages
15203-15219
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023880557
Cited by
254
References
45
FWCI
18.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Landsliding and the evolution of normal‐fault‐bounded mountains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/98jb00510
The paper
Densmore, A. L., Ellis, M. A., & Anderson, R. S. (1998). Landsliding and the evolution of normal‐fault‐bounded mountains. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/98jb00510

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.