Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Water isotope module of the ECHAM atmospheric general circulation model: A study on timescales from days to several years

Open access
Hoffmann, G., Werner, M., Heimann, M.·1998·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Results are presented of a global simulation of the stable water isotopes H 218 O and HD 16 O as implemented in the hydrological cycle of the ECHAM atmospheric general circulation model. The ECHAM model was run under present‐day climate conditions at two spatial resolutions (T42,T21), and the simulation results are compared with observations. The high‐resolution model (T42) more realistically reproduced the observations, thus demonstrating that an improved representation of advection and orography is critical when modeling the global isotopic water cycle. The deuterium excess (d=δD−8*δ 18 O) in precipitation offers additional information on climate conditions (e.g., relative humidity and temperature) which prevailed at evaporative sites. Globally, the simulated deuterium excess agrees fairly well with observations showing maxima in the interior of Asia and minima in cold marine regions. However, over Greenland the model failed to show the observed seasonality of the excess and its phase relation to δD reflecting either unrealistic source areas modeled for Greenland precipitation or inadequate description of kinetics in the isotope module. When the coarse resolution model (T21) is forced with observed sea surface temperatures from the period 1979 to 1988, it reproduced the observed weak positive correlation between the isotopic signal and the temperature as well as the weak negative anticorrelation between the isotopic signal and the precipitation. This model simulation further demonstrates that the strongest interannual climate anomaly, the El Niño Southern Oscillation, imprints a strong signal on the water isotopes. In the central Pacific the anticorrelation between the anomalous precipitation and the isotope signal reaches a maximum value of−0.8.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/98jd00423

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
Hoffmann, G., Werner, M., & Heimann, M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1998-07
Volume
103
Issue
D14
Pages
16871-16896
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066405228
Cited by
395
References
1
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water isotope module of the ECHAM atmospheric general circulation model: A study on timescales from days to several years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/98jd00423
The paper
Hoffmann, G., Werner, M., & Heimann, M. (1998). Water isotope module of the ECHAM atmospheric general circulation model: A study on timescales from days to several years. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd00423

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.