The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determining the composition of olivine from reflectance spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Reflectance spectra of olivines spanning the forsterite‐fayalite solid‐solution series have been analyzed with the modified Gaussian model (MGM). The compositional variability of the three primary absorption bands that constitute the diagnostic 10‐μm olivine feature has been quantified by examining the centers, widths, and relative strengths in 18 spectra ranging in composition from Mg‐rich forsterite to Fe‐rich fayalite. These analyses have also revealed several interrelationships among the three absorption bands that provide new insights into their crystallographic origins. The primary olivine absorptions near 1.0‐μm are well behaved and provide a means to remotely identify and estimate the composition of olivine from reflectance spectra. However, the spectral resolution and signal‐to‐noise of current remotely acquired data, combined with the significant overlap in the 1.0‐μm region, provide enough uncertainty to allow models based on simple least squares minimization to reach solutions that are mathematically satisfying yet physically unrealistic. More sophisticated models using inverse theory that incorporate constraints among the absorption bands as determined from these laboratory MGM analysis are shown to yield meaningful results which can be confidently used to estimate composition in remote data. The MGM and inverse theory are used to analyze the spectrum of the olivine‐rich asteroid 246 Asporina and to quantitatively show that the olivine component on Asporina is magnesium‐rich (i.e., forsteritic). In contrast to the systematic behavior of the three primary olivine absorptions, absorption features short of 0.7 μm are found to exhibit no obvious relationship to composition and as such are not recommended for use in remote applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Understanding the Lunar Surface and Space-Moon Interactions
Lucey, P. (2006) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/rmg.2006.60.2 · Cited by 434
Bishop, J. L., Perry, K. A., Darby Dyar, M., Bristow, T. F., Blake, D. F., Brown, A. J., & Peel, S. E. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/jgre.20066 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Sunshine, J. M., & Pieters, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- E6
- Pages
- 13675-13688
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030892084
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining the composition of olivine from reflectance spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/98je01217
- The paper
- Sunshine, J. M., & Pieters, C. M. (1998). Determining the composition of olivine from reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/98je01217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.