Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non‐WKB Alfvén waves in the solar wind

Heinemann, M., Olbert, S.·1980·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

We treat, both analytically and numerically, small‐amplitude, undamped, toroidal Alfvén waves in a model of axisymmetric solar wind flow in which solar rotation is neglected. There is no restriction to WKB waves; the waves may have any frequency. By transforming in simple ways the equations governing the waves we are able to obtain exact formal solutions to the general time‐dependent problem as well as to the Fourier‐analyzed problem. We discuss the equations and their solutions in terms of coupled inward and outward propagating waves. One integral of the equations for the Fourier amplitudes is obtained; it relates the amplitudes of the ingoing and outgoing waves. The integral is a special case of a general law of conservation of wave action, which we show to hold for finite wavelengths. The statement of the conservation of wave action is shown to be analogous to the conservation of particle‐antiparticle pairs in relativistic quantum theory. We obtain the condition required for WKB waves and show that it depends on the coupling of waves in a flowing medium. The solar wind problem is discussed in terms of the Fourier amplitudes. It is shown that there is a singularity in the equations, at the Alfvén point, which determines physically acceptable solar wind solutions. A qualitative account of the amplitudes far from the sun is given based on an exact solution for a model with constant solar wind flow speed. A conservation equation for the wave energy is obtained, and the relations among the wave energy density, energy flux density, force, and acceleration are stated. Numerical solutions, based on realistic solar wind profiles, are given. We show that non‐WKB waves with wave periods of about a day or two have somewhat greater wave energy densities, up to a factor of 2 or so, in the corona than do WKB waves with the same amplitude at 1 A.U. On the other hand, non‐WKB waves of any wave period are no more effective in accelerating the plasma than are WKB waves; they are much less effective for wave periods of a day or more. We conclude that, for conditions actually existing in the corona, WKB estimates quite accurately account throughout the corona for the wave energy density, energy flux density, and wave acceleration of the plasma for Alfvén waves with periods less than about 0.05, 1, and 0.01 day, respectively; the corresponding periods in the solar wind are about 1, 1, and 0.5 day.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/ja085ia03p01311

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Heinemann, M., & Olbert, S.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
1980-03
Volume
85
Issue
A3
Pages
1311-1327
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031684596
Cited by
257
References
1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐WKB Alfvén waves in the solar wind. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/ja085ia03p01311
The paper
Heinemann, M., & Olbert, S. (1980). Non‐WKB Alfvén waves in the solar wind. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/ja085ia03p01311

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.