The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non‐WKB Alfvén waves in the solar wind
Abstract
We treat, both analytically and numerically, small‐amplitude, undamped, toroidal Alfvén waves in a model of axisymmetric solar wind flow in which solar rotation is neglected. There is no restriction to WKB waves; the waves may have any frequency. By transforming in simple ways the equations governing the waves we are able to obtain exact formal solutions to the general time‐dependent problem as well as to the Fourier‐analyzed problem. We discuss the equations and their solutions in terms of coupled inward and outward propagating waves. One integral of the equations for the Fourier amplitudes is obtained; it relates the amplitudes of the ingoing and outgoing waves. The integral is a special case of a general law of conservation of wave action, which we show to hold for finite wavelengths. The statement of the conservation of wave action is shown to be analogous to the conservation of particle‐antiparticle pairs in relativistic quantum theory. We obtain the condition required for WKB waves and show that it depends on the coupling of waves in a flowing medium. The solar wind problem is discussed in terms of the Fourier amplitudes. It is shown that there is a singularity in the equations, at the Alfvén point, which determines physically acceptable solar wind solutions. A qualitative account of the amplitudes far from the sun is given based on an exact solution for a model with constant solar wind flow speed. A conservation equation for the wave energy is obtained, and the relations among the wave energy density, energy flux density, force, and acceleration are stated. Numerical solutions, based on realistic solar wind profiles, are given. We show that non‐WKB waves with wave periods of about a day or two have somewhat greater wave energy densities, up to a factor of 2 or so, in the corona than do WKB waves with the same amplitude at 1 A.U. On the other hand, non‐WKB waves of any wave period are no more effective in accelerating the plasma than are WKB waves; they are much less effective for wave periods of a day or more. We conclude that, for conditions actually existing in the corona, WKB estimates quite accurately account throughout the corona for the wave energy density, energy flux density, and wave acceleration of the plasma for Alfvén waves with periods less than about 0.05, 1, and 0.01 day, respectively; the corresponding periods in the solar wind are about 1, 1, and 0.5 day.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods of Theoretical Physics
Morse, P. M., Feshbach, H., & Hill, E. L. (1954) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933765 · Cited by 13,197
Cited by
The polar heliospheric magnetic field
Jokipii, J. R., & Kóta, J. (1989) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/gl016i001p00001 · Cited by 386
TESTING A PREDICTIVE THEORETICAL MODEL FOR THE MASS LOSS RATES OF COOL STARS
Cranmer, S. R., & Saar, S. H. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/1/54 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Heinemann, M., & Olbert, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- A3
- Pages
- 1311-1327
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031684596
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐WKB Alfvén waves in the solar wind. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/ja085ia03p01311
- The paper
- Heinemann, M., & Olbert, S. (1980). Non‐WKB Alfvén waves in the solar wind. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/ja085ia03p01311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.