The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Magnetic loop behind an interplanetary shock: Voyager, Helios, and IMP 8 observations
Open accessAbstract
Magnetic field and plasma data from five spacecraft (Voyager 1 and 2, Helios 1 and 2, and IMP 8) were used to analyze the flow behind an interplanetary shock. The shock was followed by a turbulent sheath in which there were large fluctuations in both the strength and the direction of the magnetic field. This in turn was followed by a region (magnetic cloud) in which the magnetic field vectors were observed to change by rotating nearly parallel to a plane, consistent with the passage of a magnetic loop. This loop extended at least 30° in longitude between 1 and 2 AU, and its radial dimension was approximately 0.5 AU. In the cloud the field strength was high, and the density and temperature were relatively low. Thus the dominant pressure in the cloud was that of the magnetic field. The total pressure inside the cloud was higher than outside, implying that the cloud was expanding as it moved outward, even at the distance of 2 AU. The momentum flux of the cloud at 2 AU was not higher than that of the preshock plasma, indicating that the cloud was not driving the shock at this distance. It is possible, however, that the shock was driven by the cloud closer to the sun where the cloud may have moved faster. An extraordinary filament was observed at the rear of the cloud. It was bounded by current sheets whose orientations were preserved over at least 0.12 AU and which were related to the plane of maximum variance of the magnetic field in the cloud.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interplanetary origin of geomagnetic storms
Gonzalez, W. D., Tsurutani, B. T., & Clúa de Gonzalez, A. L. (1999) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1023/a:1005160129098 · Cited by 688
The Heliospheric Magnetic Field
Owens, M. J., & Forsyth, R. J. (2013) · Living Reviews in Solar Physics · doi:10.12942/lrsp-2013-5 · Cited by 263
On space weather consequences and predictions
Feynman, J., & Gabriel, S. B. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/1999ja000141 · Cited by 153
Witasse, O., Sánchez‐Cano, B., Mays, M. L., Kajdič, P., Opgenoorth, H., Elliott, H. A., Richardson, I. G., Zouganelis, I., Zender, J., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., et al. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1002/2017ja023884 · Cited by 126
Galactic Cosmic Ray Density Variations in Magnetic Clouds
Belov, A., Abunin, A., Abunina, M., Eroshenko, E., Oleneva, V., Yanke, V., Papaioannou, A., & Mavromichalaki, H. (2015) · Solar Physics · doi:10.1007/s11207-015-0678-z · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Burlaga, L., Sittler, E., Mariani, F., & Schwenn, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1981-08
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- A8
- Pages
- 6673-6684
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104248815
- Cited by
- 1,637
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic loop behind an interplanetary shock: Voyager, Helios, and IMP 8 observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/ja086ia08p06673
- The paper
- Burlaga, L., Sittler, E., Mariani, F., & Schwenn, R. (1981). Magnetic loop behind an interplanetary shock: Voyager, Helios, and IMP 8 observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/ja086ia08p06673
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.