Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the origin and spatial extent of high‐latitude F region irregularities

Kelley, Michael C., Vickrey, James F., Carlson, C. W., Torbert, R.·1982·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

Further evidence is presented that structured soft‐electron precipitation is an important source of large‐scale (λ ≳ 10 km ) F region ionization irregularities in the high‐latitude ionosphere. We show that large amplitude, 20‐km to 80‐km structured plasma exists in both the dayside and nightside auroral oval. In the latter case, the structured F layer plasma has been observed to convect into and through the field of view of the Chatanika radar. Here, and in a companion paper, we hypothesize that this soft electron precipitation is the primary source of high‐latitude structure and that convection acts to distribute the irregular plasma throughout the polar ionosphere. Indeed, at the observed production scale (20–80 km), irregularities can easily convect throughout the high‐latitude region with negligible decay from classical or anomalous diffusion, including the effects of a conducting E region. Our convection/decay model also explains the following observed features of published high‐latitude irregularity data: (1) The steep gradient in irregularity intensity at the equatorward edge of the nighttime magnetospheric convection zone. (2) The existence of irregularities throughout the polar cap. (3) The reduction of irregularity intensity in the central polar cap. (4) The dawn‐dusk asymmetry in the equatorward boundary of the high‐latitude irregularity zone. On the other hand, if classical theory is applied to a 100‐m scale structure, diffusion should rapidly limit the irregularities to an area within a few degrees of the production zone, a prediction not upheld by experimental data. Thus, plasma instabilities must operate on the large‐scale structures to produce the observed intermediate scale (100 m < λ < 10 km) power law irregularity spectra. Calculations of the instability growth rate in its generalized form, which includes field‐aligned currents (the current convective instability), shows that growth should occur. The universal drift instability should then operate on these intermediate scale features. We suggest that this latter instability maintains the shorter scale plasma structure at the expense of a more rapid decay of the intermediate scale irregularities in a cascade‐like process. Enhanced, turbulent diffusion can reduce significantly the lifetime of the intermediate scale irregularities but not of the larger structures, which can therefore still transit the polar cap.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/ja087ia06p04469

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Kelley, M. C., Vickrey, J. F., Carlson, C. W., & Torbert, R.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
1982-06
Volume
87
Issue
A6
Pages
4469-4475
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993734619
Cited by
214
References
0
FWCI
22.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the origin and spatial extent of high‐latitude F region irregularities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/ja087ia06p04469
The paper
Kelley, M. C., Vickrey, J. F., Carlson, C. W., & Torbert, R. (1982). On the origin and spatial extent of high‐latitude F region irregularities. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/ja087ia06p04469

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.