Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 511

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bidirectional solar wind electron heat flux events

Gosling, J. T., Baker, D. N., Bame, S. J., Feldman, W. C., Zwickl, R. D., Smith, E. J.·1987·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

Normally the ≳ 80‐eV electrons which carry the solar wind electron heat flux are collimated along the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) in the direction pointing outward away from the sun. Occasionally, however, collimated fluxes of ≳ 80‐eV electrons are observed traveling both parallel and antiparallel to the IMF. Here we present the results of a survey of such bidirectional electron heat flux events as observed with the plasma and magnetic field experiments aboard ISEE 3 at times when the spacecraft was not magnetically connected to the earth's bow shock. The onset of a bidirectional electron heat flux at ISEE 3 usually signals spacecraft entry into a distinct solar wind plasma and field entity, most often characterized by anomalously low proton and electron temperatures, a strong, smoothly varying magnetic field, a low plasma beta, and a high total pressure. Significant field rotations often occur at the beginning and/or end of bidirectional heat flux events, and, at times, the large field rotations characteristic of “magnetic clouds” are present. Approximately half of all bidirectional heat flux events are associated with and follow interplanetary shocks, while the other events have no obvious shock associations. When shock associated, the delay from shock passage typically is ∼13 hours, corresponding to a radial separation of ∼0.16 AU. Independent of any shock association, bidirectional heat flux events typically are ∼0.13 AU thick in the radial direction, although considerable variability is evident from one event to another. Near solar activity maximum, bidirectional heat flux events occurred at a rate of ∼3 per month, and the solar wind electron heat flux was bidirectional ∼5% of the time. Bidirectional heat flux events often contain strong out‐of‐the‐ecliptic field components and thus can be effective in producing geomagnetic disturbances. This is particularly true for shock‐associated events where the intrinsically strong fields in the leading portions of the events are amplified by compression in transit from the sun and where strong out‐of‐the‐ecliptic field components resulting from compression and draping of the ambient field are often present within the shocked plasma immediately ahead. Consistent with previous work we interpret the bidirectional heat flux as evidence for a closed field topology in interplanetary space. Further, we suggest that these events are one of the more prominent signatures of coronal mass ejection events in the solar wind at 1 AU.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/ja092ia08p08519

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 511

Metadata

Authors
Gosling, J. T., Baker, D. N., Bame, S. J., Feldman, W. C., Zwickl, R. D., & Smith, E. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
1987-08
Volume
92
Issue
A8
Pages
8519-8535
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046189229
Cited by
511
References
0
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bidirectional solar wind electron heat flux events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/ja092ia08p08519
The paper
Gosling, J. T., Baker, D. N., Bame, S. J., Feldman, W. C., Zwickl, R. D., & Smith, E. J. (1987). Bidirectional solar wind electron heat flux events. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/ja092ia08p08519

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.