Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,287

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rises, trenches, great faults, and crustal blocks

Morgan, W. Jason·1968·Journal of Geophysical Research

Abstract

The transform fault concept is extended to a spherical surface. The earth's surface is considered to be made of a number of rigid crustal blocks. It is assumed that each block is bounded by rises (where new surface is formed), trenches or young fold mountains (where surface is being destroyed), and great faults, and that there is no stretching, folding, or distortion of any kind within a given block. On a spherical surface, the motion of one block (over the mantle) relative to another block may then be described by a rotation of one block relative to the other block. This rotation requires three parameters, two to locate the pole of relative rotation and one to specify the magnitude of the angular velocity. If two adjacent blocks have as common boundaries a number of great faults, all of these faults must lie on ‘circles of latitude’ about the pole of relative rotation. The velocity of one block relative to the other must vary along their common boundary; this velocity would have a maximum at the ‘equator’ and would vanish at a pole of relative rotation. The motion of Africa relative to South America is a case for which enough data are available to critically test this hypothesis. The many offsets on the mid-Atlantic ridge appear to be compatible with a pole of relative rotation at 62°N (±5°), 36°W (±2°). The velocity pattern predicted by this choice of pole roughly agrees with the spreading velocities determined from magnetic anomalies. The motion of the Pacific block relative to North America is also examined. The strike of faults from the Gulf of California to Alaska and the angles inferred from earthquake mechanism solutions both imply a pole of relative rotation at 53°N (±3°), 53°W (±5°). The spreading of the Pacific-Antarctic ridge shows the best agreement with this hypothesis. The Antarctic block is found to be moving relative to the Pacific block about a pole at 71°S (±2°), 118°E (±5°) with a maximum spreading rate of 5.7 (±0.2) cm/yr. An estimate of the motion of the Antarctic block relative to Africa is made by assuming closure of the Africa-America-Pacific-Antarctica-Africa circuit and summing the three angular velocity vectors for the cases above.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb073i006p01959

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Morgan, W. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research
Published
1968-03-15
Volume
73
Issue
6
Pages
1959-1982
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089850899
Cited by
1,287
References
0
FWCI
87.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.