The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of long-wavelength residual elevation and free air gravity anomalies in the North Atlantic and possible implications for the thickness of the lithospheric plate
Abstract
For most oceans the basic feature of the elevation of ridges is a uniform relation between subsidence and age directly associated with the creation and cooling of the oceanic plate. In the North Atlantic we show that superimposed upon this subsidence curve are long-wavelength (>400-km) residual elevation anomalies up to 1200-m amplitude between 50°N and 10°N that are linearly related to regional variations in the free air gravity field. It is unlikely that this relation can be accounted for by sources in the lithosphere and hence it may be evidence of mass excesses or flow in the upper mantle. Further, the correlation between free air gravity and residual depth is two dimensional and passes through the origin with the same sign and gradient as were predicted by investigations of convection in a Newtonian fluid. We assume a correlation between long-wavelength residual elevation and free air gravity anomalies. Hence where the free air gravity field is close to zero, there should be no residual elevation anomaly. Thus the absence of a large free air gravity anomaly in the North Pacific, other than close to the Hawaiian Island chain, permits us to extend the uniform depth versus age relation from 80 to 150 m.y. B.P. The very small increase of depth with age in the Cretaceous and the uniform heat flow through old oceanic crust are evidence that the oceanic plate has a finite thickness, which can be detected in crust older than 80 m.y. B.P.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some remarks on heat flow and gravity anomalies
McKenzie, D. P. (1967) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz072i024p06261 · Cited by 751
Speculations on the Thermal and Tectonic History of the Earth
McKenzie, D., & Weiss, N. (2007) · Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1975.tb05855.x · Cited by 335
Convection and the Large Scale Circulation of the Mantle
Richter, F. M. (1973) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb078i035p08735 · Cited by 251
Cited by
On the regional variation of heat flow, geotherms, and lithospheric thickness
Pollack, H. N., & Chapman, D. S. (1977) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/0040-1951(77)90215-3 · Cited by 1,049
Composition and development of the continental tectosphere
Jordan, T. H. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/274544a0 · Cited by 835
Thermal origin of mid-plate hot-spot swells
Crough, S. T. (1978) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1978.tb04282.x · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Sclater, J. G., Lawver, L. A., & Parsons, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1975-03-10
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1031-1052
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036130866
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 33.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of long-wavelength residual elevation and free air gravity anomalies in the North Atlantic and possible implications for the thickness of the lithospheric plate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb080i008p01031
- The paper
- Sclater, J. G., Lawver, L. A., & Parsons, B. (1975). Comparison of long-wavelength residual elevation and free air gravity anomalies in the North Atlantic and possible implications for the thickness of the lithospheric plate. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb080i008p01031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.