Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the interaction of two scales of convection in the mantle

Richter, Frank M., Parsons, Barry·1975·Journal of Geophysical Research

Abstract

A system in which convection takes place in the upper mantle on two distinct horizontal length scales is proposed. This is consistent with the existence of the plates themselves, the relatively constant heat flux background in older ocean basins, and the knowledge of convection in fluid layers gained from laboratory and numerical experiments. The large-scale circulation consists of the plates themselves and the return flow necessary to conserve mass. The small-scale flow, analogous to Rayleigh-Benard convection or variants of this, which have been the main target of numerical study, provides the necessary vertical heat transport in the upper mantle that supplies the required heat flux at the base of the lithosphere. The depth of convection is taken to be down to the 650-km seismic discontinuity, and this depth characterizes the horizontal length scale of the small-scale convection. This system is studied by means of a set of laboratory experiments that explore the interaction of the small-scale convection with the large-scale flow. The experiments show the plausibility of convection on two scales. Furthermore, they suggest that beneath fast-moving plates (absolute velocities around 10 cm y−1) the small-scale convection will align itself as rolls in the direction of the large-scale flow in geologically short times. However, beneath very slow moving plates the times required for the alignment of convective rolls are long in comparison with times over which no changes in plate motions are to be expected. Here the convective planform is more likely to take the form of upwelling and downwelling spouts. Thus this simple system of a convecting layer beneath a moving boundary contains the possibility of explaining a wide variety of surface features. Observational tests of the consequences of the two-scale idea are suggested, and the assumptions on which this idea is based are critically discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb080i017p02529

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Richter, F. M., & Parsons, B.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research
Published
1975-06-10
Volume
80
Issue
17
Pages
2529-2541
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009824639
Cited by
388
References
33
FWCI
17.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the interaction of two scales of convection in the mantle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb080i017p02529
The paper
Richter, F. M., & Parsons, B. (1975). On the interaction of two scales of convection in the mantle. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb080i017p02529

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.