Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 464

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large-scale heterogeneities in the lower mantle

Dziewonski, Adam M., Hager, Bradford H., O'Connell, Richard J.·1977·Journal of Geophysical Research

Abstract

Coefficients of a spherical harmonic expansion, up to angular order 3, of velocity anomalies in five shells within the earth's mantle were obtained from an analysis of nearly 700,000 P wave travel time residuals. The results for depths less than 1100 km are unreliable; on the basis of tests and numerical experiments we infer that lateral heterogeneities in this depth interval are dominated by velocity perturbations of lateral dimensions less than 5000 km. Relatively large wavelength features were resolved below 1500-km depth; the average perturbation level increases in the lowermost mantle. The region between 1100 and 1500 km may represent a transition zone with respect to the dimensions of anomalies. We present statistical evidence for a negative correlation between the long wavelength gravity anomalies observed at the surface and those computed from velocity anomalies at depths greater than 1100 km under the assumption of proportionality between velocity and density perturbations. The proportionality coefficient Δυ/Δρ has been determined by using two different methods: the values are −4.45 and −6.02 (km/s)/(g/cm3). Only minor changes in the velocity distribution are needed to satisfy the long wavelength gravity field exactly. Possible origins of the correlation are (1) sinking of eclogite-rich material into the lower mantle from regions of lithospheric subduction, (2) chemical plumes of light high-velocity material originating near the core-mantle boundary, (3) temperature differences and perturbations of the core-mantle boundary and the earth's surface associated with mantle-wide convection, or (4) static chemical heterogeneities in a nonconvecting mantle. The first three alternatives, all involving flow in the lower mantle, may be complementary but act on a different time scale. There appears to be a westward or northwestward translation of some anomalies with respect to the pattern obtained for the innermost shell. In particular, the direction of translation of a large negative anomaly under the Pacific is in agreement with the sense of motion of the Pacific plate. We must caution the reader, however, that this is a highly speculative interpretation. If correct, it would favor the convective hypotheses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb082i002p00239

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 464

Metadata

Authors
Dziewonski, A. M., Hager, B. H., & O'Connell, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research
Published
1977-01-10
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
239-255
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991431833
Cited by
464
References
1
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-scale heterogeneities in the lower mantle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb082i002p00239
The paper
Dziewonski, A. M., Hager, B. H., & O'Connell, R. J. (1977). Large-scale heterogeneities in the lower mantle. Journal of Geophysical Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb082i002p00239

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.