The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bulk modulus—volume relationship for cation‐anion polyhedra
Abstract
A bulk modulus—volume relationship is demonstrated for cation coordination polyhedra in a variety of structure types including oxides, silicates, halides, sulfides, phosphides, and carbides: K p 〈d〉3/S2z c z a = 7.5 (Mbar Å 3), where K P is the polyhedral bulk modulus (in megabars), 〈d〉 is the mean cation‐anion separation (in angstroms), z c and z a are the cation and anion formal charge, and S2 is an empirical ionicity term, defined as 0.50 for oxides and silicates and calculated to be 0.75 for halides; 0.40 for sulfides, selenides, and tellurides; 0.25 for phosphides, arsenides, and antimonides; and 0.20 for carbides. The bulk modulus of a substance depends on the bulk moduli of component polyhedra and the manner in which these polyhedra are linked. In corner‐linked structures, such as quartz and framework silicates, mineral bulk moduli are significantly less than those of constituent corner‐linked polyhedra, because of accommodations resulting from changes of the metal‐oxygen‐metal angles. In layer structures such as micas, with extensive edge sharing within the layers but weak bonds between the layers, compression is highly anisotropic. Structures such as periclase, spinel, and garnet, with extensive edge sharing between polyhedra in three dimensions, have large bulk moduli similar to those of constituent polyhedra. Bulk moduli of mantle mineral phases approximate the moduli of component polyhedra because most mantle mineral structure types have edge sharing in three dimensions. Compression for a given polyhedron does not appear to depend upon the linkage topology of the structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kieffer, S. W. (1982) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg020i004p00827 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Hazen, R. M., & Finger, L. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1979-11-10
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- B12
- Pages
- 6723-6728
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018192662
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bulk modulus—volume relationship for cation‐anion polyhedra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb084ib12p06723
- The paper
- Hazen, R. M., & Finger, L. W. (1979). Bulk modulus—volume relationship for cation‐anion polyhedra. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb084ib12p06723
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.