The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the scaling of crater dimensions: 2. Impact processes
Abstract
Existing theoretical and empirical scaling rules for cratering phenomena are commonly based upon implicit assumptions regarding the roles of the impactor conditions and the target properties. It is common, for example, to assume that only the kinetic energy of the impactor and the work against gravity in the target govern large impact craters. A more general case is considered here. A spherical impactor is characterized by its kinetic energy, momentum, and various material properties of both the impactor and the target. Under these general assumptions, scaling among both similar and nonsimilar events is studied. Similar events always satisfy the cube‐root mass scaling rule. The dependence on energy varies according to how the similarity is achieved. For constant mass or constant velocity tests, variations in gravity are required, and cube‐root energy scaling is obtained. For a strengthless material only, quarter‐root energy scaling is possible, but only for restricted variations in both impactor mass and velocity, which imply that the mass is proportional to the three‐quarters power of the energy. Scaling rules for the more common and more useful application to nonsimilar events (e.g., variable energy and/or velocity at constant gravity) are shown to be bounded by certain well defined limits. Dimensional analysis is used with plausible assumptions on the sign of the partial derivative of the crater volume with regard to each of the independent variables. Distinctions are made among different forms of cube‐root scaling obtained from strength‐dominated phenomena. Quarter‐root scaling is shown to be a distinct limit to gravity domination, occurring only when there is no dependence upon impactor velocity and target strength. Special cases of the general scaling obtained correspond to degenerate forms common in the literature. Of these, energy scaling, momentum scaling, strength scaling, and gravity scaling are shown to be the bounds for all permissible scaling rules. This result is shown to be in agreement with a comprehensive collection of data obtained from a survey of the literature. Included are experimental results for both geological materials and metals, analytical models, and finite difference code calculations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Impact and Explosion Cratering
Runcorn, S. K. (1984) · Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/0031-9201(84)90073-6 · Cited by 1,314
V. Impact with a liquid surface, studied by the aid of instantaneous photography
Worthington, A. M., & Cole, R. S. (1897) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1897.0005 · Cited by 298
Gault, D. E. (1973) · The Moon · doi:10.1007/bf02630651 · Cited by 175
Simple Z Model of Cratering, Ejection, and the Overturned Flap
Maxwell, D. E. (1976) · Cited by 95
THEORY OF IMPACT: SOME GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND THE METHOD OF EULERIAN CODES
Dienes, J. K., & WALSH, J. M. (1970) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-408950-1.50008-2 · Cited by 91
Theory and experiments on centrifuge cratering
Schmidt, R. M., & Holsapple, K. A. (1980) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jb085ib01p00235 · Cited by 78
Self-citationAn analysis of cratering data from desert alluvium
Nordyke, M. D. (1962) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jz067i005p01965 · Cited by 66
On the scaling of crater dimensions: 1. Explosive processes
Holsapple, K. A., & Schmidt, R. M. (1980) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jb085ib12p07247 · Cited by 63
Self-citationExperimental hypervelocity impact into quartz sand. II - Effects of gravitational acceleration
Gault, D. E., & Wedekind, J. A. (1977) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 57
Impact melt generation and transport
Orphal, D. L., Borden, W. F., Larson, S., & Schultz, P. H. (1980) · USRA Houston Repository (Lunar and Planetary Institute) · Cited by 44
Cited by
Melosh, H. J., & Ivanov, B. A. (1999) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.385 · Cited by 538
Crater ejecta scaling laws: Fundamental forms based on dimensional analysis
Housen, K. R., Schmidt, R. M., & Holsapple, K. A. (1983) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb088ib03p02485 · Cited by 494
Self-citationSome recent advances in the scaling of impact and explosion cratering
Schmidt, R. M., & Housen, K. R. (1987) · International Journal of Impact Engineering · doi:10.1016/0734-743x(87)90069-8 · Cited by 444
Self-citationOn the fragmentation of asteroids and planetary satellites
Housen, K. R., & Holsapple, K. A. (1990) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90168-9 · Cited by 254
Self-citationSize and morphology of the Chicxulub impact crater
Morgan, J., Warner, M., the Chicxulub Working Group, Brittan, J., Buffler, R., Camargo, A., Christeson, G., Denton, P., Hildebrand, A., Hobbs, R., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37291 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Holsapple, K. A., & Schmidt, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1982-03-10
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- B3
- Pages
- 1849-1870
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091846845
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the scaling of crater dimensions: 2. Impact processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb087ib03p01849
- The paper
- Holsapple, K. A., & Schmidt, R. M. (1982). On the scaling of crater dimensions: 2. Impact processes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb087ib03p01849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.