The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flow strengths of quartz aggregates: Grain size and pressure effects due to hydrolytic weakening
Abstract
Novaculites and quartzite ranging in grain size from 1.2–211 μm have been experimentally deformed at confining pressures of 350–1620 MPa under conditions of constant displacement rate and constant deviatoric stress in order to determine the effects of both grain size and pressure on the rheology of quartzite. The amount of water available to the samples was varied so that flow strengths for the entire suite of samples could be compared at several, nominally equal water concentrations; samples were vacuum dried at 800°C for 12 hours, left as is, or sealed in Pt jackets with 0.03–0.4 wt % water added. Novaculites deformed at 800°C and 10−6 /s−1 in the presence of 0.4 wt % water show a continuous decrease in flow strength with increasing confining pressure over the range 350–1590 MPa. At high confining pressures 950–1600 MPa, constant displacement rate experiments show three distinct grain size effects, corresponding to the three levels of water concentration: (1) “grain boundary hardening” for vacuum‐dried samples, (2) grain size independent strength for as is samples, and (3) “grain boundary weakening” for samples deformed in the presence of water. Although grain boundary‐dislocation interactions may lead to grain boundary hardening and grain boundary sliding to weakening, the details of the mechanical data, in combination with microstructural observations, are inconsistent with existing models of intrinsic grain boundary effects. Instead, the strength‐grain size relations are interpreted as resulting from variations in structurally incorporated water, which, in turn, are controlled by diffusion of water to and from the grain boundaries. Finally, constant stress experiments show that the activation energy Q and stress exponent n for creep do not depend on grain size, so that the different strengths observed must be incorporated in the preexponential terms. However, both Q and n show a continuous decrease with increasing amounts of available water, from Q = 300 kJ/mol and n ≃ 4 for vacuum‐heated samples, to Q = 130 kJ/mol and n = 2.6 for water‐added samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Deformation and Ageing of Mild Steel: III Discussion of Results
Hall, E. O. (1951) · Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section B · doi:10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 · Cited by 7,872
Westwater, J. W., & Drickamer, H. G. (1957) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01562a070 · Cited by 4,076
The Cleavage Strength of Polycrystals
Petch, N. J. (1953) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,641
Diffusional Viscosity of a Polycrystalline Solid
Herring, C. (1950) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699681 · Cited by 2,487
A Model for Boundary Diffusion Controlled Creep in Polycrystalline Materials
Coble, R. L. (1963) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1702656 · Cited by 2,333
Smithells, C. J., & Smith, C. S. (1949) · Cited by 1,791
Crystalline plasticity and solid state flow in metamorphic rocks
(1978) · International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts · doi:10.1016/0148-9062(78)90995-6 · Cited by 698
Leffmann, H. (1920) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/s0016-0032(20)90415-5 · Cited by 666
Crystalline plasticity and solid state flow in metamorphic rocks
Lister, G. (1977) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/0040-1951(77)90123-8 · Cited by 596
Etheridge, M. A., Wall, V. J., Cox, S. F., & Vernon, R. H. (1984) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb089ib06p04344 · Cited by 552
Cited by
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments
Kohlstedt, D. L., Evans, B., & Mackwell, S. J. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/95jb01460 · Cited by 1,603
Flow properties of continental lithosphere
Carter, N. L., & Tsenn, M. C. (1987) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/0040-1951(87)90333-7 · Cited by 757
Rheology of the lithosphere: Selected topics
Kirby, S. H., & Kronenberg, A. K. (1987) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg025i006p01219 · Cited by 695
Self-citationDynamic recrystallization of quartz: correlation between natural and experimental conditions
Stipp, M., Stünitz, H., Heilbronner, R., & Schmid, S. M. (2002) · Geological Society, London, Special Publications · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2001.200.01.11 · Cited by 527
Law, R. D. (2014) · Journal of Structural Geology · doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2014.05.023 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Kronenberg, A. K., & Tullis, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1984-06-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- B6
- Pages
- 4281-4297
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979701378
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flow strengths of quartz aggregates: Grain size and pressure effects due to hydrolytic weakening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb089ib06p04281
- The paper
- Kronenberg, A. K., & Tullis, J. (1984). Flow strengths of quartz aggregates: Grain size and pressure effects due to hydrolytic weakening. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb089ib06p04281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.