Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flow strengths of quartz aggregates: Grain size and pressure effects due to hydrolytic weakening

Kronenberg, Andreas K., Tullis, Jan·1984·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Novaculites and quartzite ranging in grain size from 1.2–211 μm have been experimentally deformed at confining pressures of 350–1620 MPa under conditions of constant displacement rate and constant deviatoric stress in order to determine the effects of both grain size and pressure on the rheology of quartzite. The amount of water available to the samples was varied so that flow strengths for the entire suite of samples could be compared at several, nominally equal water concentrations; samples were vacuum dried at 800°C for 12 hours, left as is, or sealed in Pt jackets with 0.03–0.4 wt % water added. Novaculites deformed at 800°C and 10−6 /s−1 in the presence of 0.4 wt % water show a continuous decrease in flow strength with increasing confining pressure over the range 350–1590 MPa. At high confining pressures 950–1600 MPa, constant displacement rate experiments show three distinct grain size effects, corresponding to the three levels of water concentration: (1) “grain boundary hardening” for vacuum‐dried samples, (2) grain size independent strength for as is samples, and (3) “grain boundary weakening” for samples deformed in the presence of water. Although grain boundary‐dislocation interactions may lead to grain boundary hardening and grain boundary sliding to weakening, the details of the mechanical data, in combination with microstructural observations, are inconsistent with existing models of intrinsic grain boundary effects. Instead, the strength‐grain size relations are interpreted as resulting from variations in structurally incorporated water, which, in turn, are controlled by diffusion of water to and from the grain boundaries. Finally, constant stress experiments show that the activation energy Q and stress exponent n for creep do not depend on grain size, so that the different strengths observed must be incorporated in the preexponential terms. However, both Q and n show a continuous decrease with increasing amounts of available water, from Q = 300 kJ/mol and n ≃ 4 for vacuum‐heated samples, to Q = 130 kJ/mol and n = 2.6 for water‐added samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/jb089ib06p04281

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Kronenberg, A. K., & Tullis, J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1984-06-10
Volume
89
Issue
B6
Pages
4281-4297
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979701378
Cited by
338
References
22
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flow strengths of quartz aggregates: Grain size and pressure effects due to hydrolytic weakening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb089ib06p04281
The paper
Kronenberg, A. K., & Tullis, J. (1984). Flow strengths of quartz aggregates: Grain size and pressure effects due to hydrolytic weakening. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb089ib06p04281

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.